Probiotics can help prevent upper respiratory tract infections

Summary: A recent study analyzing ten individual trials offers evidence that probiotics (beneficial flora such as Lactobacillus, Bifidus and other species) help prevent acute upper respiratory tract infections.

A study published recently by The Cochrane Library examined the potential for probiotics taken as supplements to ward off upper respiratory tract infections. The authors state:

Probiotics may improve a person’s health by regulating their immune function. Some studies show that probiotic strains can prevent respiratory infections…Acute upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs) include the common cold, inflammation of the trachea and larynx with symptoms including fever, cough, pain and headaches…Some live micro-organisms can confer a health benefit to the patient when administered in adequate amounts. Lactic acid bacteria and bifidobacteria are the most common types of probiotics… However, no evidence of the benefits of probiotics for acute upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs) and related potential adverse effects has been published. “

So they set out to assess the effectiveness and safety of probiotics for preventing acute upper respiratory tract infections by examining a range of international randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compare probiotics with placebo. What did the data show?

“We found that probiotics were better than placebo when measuring the number of participants experiencing episodes of acute URTI: at least one episode: odds ratio (OR) 0.58; at least three episodes: OR 0.53…and reduced antibiotic prescription rates for acute URTIs: OR 0.67…Side effects of probiotics were minor and gastrointestinal symptoms were the most common.”

As the ability to research the vast human microbiome and its vital interactions with an individual’s unique resident flora for immune and metabolic modulation continue emerge, we are slowly gaining more insight into how to use probiotics to benefit health in many ways. This and other studies offer compelling evidence that we can benefit by ‘exercising’ our immune system and modulating the genetic expression of our stable resident flora with appropriate probiotic administration in key foods and supplements. The authors conclude:

“Probiotics were better than placebo in reducing the number of participants experiencing episodes of acute URTIs, the rate ratio of episodes of acute URTI and reducing antibiotic use. This indicates that probiotics may be more beneficial than placebo for preventing acute URTIs.”

Lab tests that examine microbial DNA in the stool help to know which strain of beneficial flora and when.

Vaginal probiotics prevent recurrent urinary tract infections

Not surprisingly considering the profound importance of our microbial ecology for immune and barrier tissue health, a study published in the journal Clinical Infectious Diseases offers evidence that probiotic organisms applied intravaginally can put a halt to recurrent urinary tract infections. The authors state:

“Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are common among women and frequently recur. Depletion of vaginal lactobacilli is associated with UTI risk, which suggests that repletion may be beneficial. We conducted a double-blind placebo-controlled trial of a Lactobacillus crispatus intravaginal suppository probiotic (Lactin-V; Osel) for prevention of recurrent UTI in premenopausal women.”

They treated 100 young women with a history of recurrent UTI with antimicrobials for an acute UTI, randomized them to receive either the probiotic or placebo daily for 5 days, then once weekly for 10 weeks. The subjects were followed up at 1 and 10 week intervals with urine cultures and PCR for the probiotic by vaginal swabs. What did the data show?

“Recurrent UTI occurred in 7/48 15% of women receiving Lactin-V compared with 13/48 27% of women receiving placebo. High-level vaginal colonization with L. crispatus throughout follow-up was associated with a significant reduction in recurrent UTI…”

The microbial ecology is as important in the genitourinary region as elsewhere. I have a preference for a multi-species formula for this purpose.

Antibiotic use can promote inflammatory bowel disease in childhood

The use of antibiotics demands great care and discrimination. A paper just published in Gut, An International Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology offers further evidence that disruption of the microbial ecology can promote autoimmune disorders. The authors state:

“The composition of the intestinal microflora has been proposed as an important factor in the development of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). Antibiotics have the potential to alter the composition of the intestinal microflora. A study was undertaken to evaluate the potential association between use of antibiotics and IBD in childhood.”

They examined all Danish singleton children born from 1995 to 2003 (577,627 children) for correlations between antibiotic prescriptions and IBD while taking into consideration potential confounding variables. They then calculated rate ratios (RRs) of IBD according to antibiotic use. Their data painted a compelling picture:

“IBD was diagnosed in 117 children during 3,173,117 person-years of follow-up. The RR of IBD was 1.84 for antibiotic users compared with non-users. This association appeared to be an effect on Crohn’s disease (CD) alone (RR 3.41) and was strongest in the first 3 months following use (RR 4.43) and among children with ≥7 courses of antibiotics (RR 7.32).”

In other words, there was an 84% increase in IBD for antibiotic users versus non-users. The increase in Crohn’s disease was particularly dramatic—341% in general, 443% in the first 3 months after antibiotic use, and a whopping 732% for children who had seven or more courses of antibiotics. The authors conclude:

Antibiotic use is common in childhood and its potential as an environmental risk factor for IBD warrants scrutiny. This is the first prospective study to show a strong association between antibiotic use and CD in childhood.”

While, as the authors concede, an observational study does not establish causality, prudence dictates that care be taken in evaluating each patient for propensities to autoimmune disorders, and to apply appropriate pro- and prebiotic support during and after antimicrobial therapy.

Probiotics can reduce the frequency, length and severity of common colds

A new era of research is opening up our understanding of the role of the human microbiome, the microbial flora of our body that outnumber our own cells by at least ten to one. The potential for helping with a multitude of diseases by exploiting their influence on immune and metabolic regulation is only beginning to be understood. Research just published in the European Journal of Nutrition offers evidence that probiotics can be used to ward off and reduce the severity of common colds. The authors set out to…

“…investigate whether consumption of Lactobacillus plantarum and Lactobacillus paracasei could affect naturally acquired common cold infections in healthy subjects. “

They performed a randomised, parallel, double-blind placebo-controlled study with 272 subjects to investigate whether the probiotic mixture could reduce the risk of common cold episodes, number of days with common cold symptoms, frequency and severity of symptoms, and affect the cellular immune response in common cold infections. Their data showed that for those who received the probiotics, both the total symptom score and number of symptom days were markedly reduced:

“The incidence of acquiring one or more common cold episode was reduced from 67% in the control group to 55% in the probiotic group. Also, the number of days with common cold symptoms were significantly reduced from 8.6 days in the control group to 6.2 days, in the probiotic group… The total symptom score was reduced during the study period from a mean of 44.4 for the control group to 33.6 for the probiotic group. The reduction in pharyngeal symptoms was significant.”

While there are countless disorders far worse than the common cold, there is emerging evidence that supporting the immune system for this purpose may reduce the risk of more serious diseases too. As for the common cold…

“In conclusion, intake of the probiotic strains Lactobacillus plantarum HEAL 9 (DSM 15312) and Lactobacillus paracasei 8700:2 (DSM 13434) reduces the risk of acquiring common cold infections.”

Taking probiotics after antibiotics is not the same as with intact gut flora

An interesting study just published in the journal Genome Research examines the differing effects of introducing microflora into the gut environment with and without prior antibiotic treatment. The authors note:

“The intestinal microbiota consists of over 1000 species, which play key roles in gut physiology and homeostasis. Imbalances in the composition of this bacterial community can lead to transient intestinal dysfunctions and chronic disease states. Understanding how to manipulate this ecosystem is thus essential for treating many disorders.”

They employed recent technological advances to examine by DNA analysis the long-term effects of transplanting bacteria into the intestine with and without antibiotic pretreatment. Their findings were most interesting:

“The transplantation produced a marked increase in the microbial diversity of the recipients, which stemmed from both capture of new phylotypes and increase in abundance of others. However, when transplantation was performed after antibiotic intake, the resulting state simply combined the reshaping effects of the individual treatments (including the reduced diversity from antibiotic treatment alone). Therefore, lowering the recipient bacterial load by antibiotic intake prior to transplantation did not increase establishment of the donor phylotypes…Remarkably, all of these effects were observed after 1 mo of treatment and persisted after 3 mo.”

In other words, rather than opening a niche for the transplantation of beneficial flora, engendering a diverse microbial ecology was inhibited by the destruction of organisms and change in gut homeostasis by the antibiotic.  Moreover, the effects are long-lasting. The authors conclude by stating:

“Overall, our results indicate that the indigenous gut microbial composition is more plastic that previously anticipated. However, since antibiotic pretreatment counterintuitively interferes with the establishment of an exogenous community, such plasticity is likely conditioned more by the altered microbiome gut homeostasis caused by antibiotics than by the primary bacterial loss.”

Clinicians should take this into consideration when charting a course for the re-establishment of a healthy gut microbial ecology. Patients should understand that it may take a long time and may not be easy as it goes through a sequence of stages.

Changes in gut flora can ‘turn on’ autoimmune genes

A fascinating study just published in the journal Cell sheds light on how the genetic susceptibility to autoimmune disease can be activated by changes in gut flora, in this case the interaction of a virus with intestinal bacteria. The authors describe their findings:

“Here we demonstrate that an interaction between a specific virus infection and a mutation in the Crohn’s disease susceptibility gene Atg16L1 induces intestinal pathologies in mice…These pathologies triggered by virus-plus-susceptibility gene interaction were dependent on TNFα and IFNγ [pro-inflammatory cytokines] and were prevented by treatment with broad spectrum antibiotics. Thus, we provide a specific example of how a virus-plus-susceptibility gene interaction can, in combination with additional environmental factors and commensal bacteria, determine the phenotype [functional expression] of hosts carrying common risk alleles [genotype] for inflammatory disease.”

A perspective on this work published in Science Translational Medicine helps us to appreciate the significance of this research:

“…these findings link host genotype and viral infection with a response to chemical challenge, resulting in Crohn’s-like symptoms, a virus–plus–susceptibility gene interaction. However, the story gets even more complicated, because this interaction was shown to depend not only on the host inflammatory cytokines TNF-α and interferon-γ, but also on the gut microbiome…These findings are consistent with other models of IBD that are clearly dependent on the presence of gut bacteria and can be produced in germ-free mice colonized with defined bacterial consortia in the absence of a viral trigger.”

The practical message for the clinician and patient is that genetic susceptibility to an autoimmune disease can be triggered by alterations in the gut flora with compromise of the intestinal barrier (‘leaky gut’):

“These studies suggest that the microbiota is a key component of colitis; in mouse models, colitis develops in the context of abnormal adaptive or innate immune responses that fail to prevent translocation across the epithelial layer and the presentation of gut bacteria to immune cells ['leaky gut'], or result in excess activation of the adaptive immune system [dysregulated immune response].”

As we know, once these genes are ‘turned on’ they can’t be turned off. Autoimmune disease can be managed with the correct functional approach; the term ‘cure’ is not justified:

“A fascinating observation from Cadwell et al. is that susceptibility to colitis induction can be switched from off to on; mice in a colitis-resistant state before infection with the virus become susceptible to injury-induced colitis after viral infection, and, once the colitis-sensitive state is induced, cannot go back to a colitis-resistant state.”

Rational therapy that offers the chance to manage autoimmune disease for a much higher quality of life must address the microflora and their interactions with the human immune system along with other factors that modify the expression of the autoimmune potential:

“All of these diverse findings suggest that it is necessary to take into account multiple facets of the human microbiome when considering complex diseases such as Crohn’s. Polymorphisms in key susceptibility genes in our human genome, such as ATG16L1, may only serve to weaken the first link in the chain that protects the intestinal epithelia from a combination of viral infection, microbial stimulation of inflammation, and other dietary or xenobiotic factors.”

Beneficial E. coli helps heal ulcerative colitis

The emerging science of the human microbiome and modulation of the immune system by introducing specific strains of probiotic flora into the gut and other microbial ecosystems is one of the most fascinating and promising developments in medicine. A study published some time back in the journal GUT (An International Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology) is among a number of investigations into the benefit of Escherichia coli Nissle 1917 in stimulating the immune system to heal ulcerative colitis:

“We compared the efficacy in maintaining remission of the probiotic preparation Escherichia coli Nissle 1917 and established therapy with mesalazine in patients with ulcerative colitis.”

The authors assigned 327 patients to receive either the Escherichia coli Nissle 1917 or mesalazine and evaluated the outcomes according to clinical, endoscopic  and histologic (tissue microscopic) indices over a twelve month period. Mesalazine is an anti-inflammatory medication administered by suppository that is not without concerns, and a suppressive palliation at best.

“The primary aim of the study was to confirm equivalent efficacy of the two drugs in the prevention of relapses.”

Wouldn’t it be better to stimulate the immune system to express healthier regulation if possible? The data established this notable conclusion:

The probiotic drug E coli Nissle 1917 shows efficacy and safety in maintaining remission equivalent to the gold standard mesalazine in patients with ulcerative colitis. The effectiveness of probiotic treatment further underlines the pathogenetic significance of the enteric flora.”

This is but one example among many more you’ll be hearing about in this fascinating and promising area of research and clinical application.

Probiotics treat mastitis better than antibiotics

Clinical Infectious DiseasesA study published last month in the journal Clinical Infectious Diseases offers an interesting surprise about the treatment of mastitis (infection of the breast).

Mastitis is a common infectious disease during lactation, and the main etiological agents are staphylococci, streptococci, and/or corynebacteria. The efficacy of oral administration of…two lactobacilli strains isolated from breast milk, to treat lactational mastitis was evaluated and was compared with the efficacy of antibiotic therapy.”

What happened to the women who took probiotics instead of antibiotics?

“On day 21, the mean bacterial counts in the probiotic groups were lower than that of the control group…Women assigned to the probiotic groups improved more and had lower recurrence of mastitis than those assigned to the antibiotic group.”

Of course there is the obvious advantage of not decimating the patient’s microbial ecology. This impressive result, summed up in the authors’ conclusion, is worth bearing in mind if you’re nursing a baby who caring for someone who is:

“The use of L. fermentum CECT5716 or L. salivarius CECT5713 appears to be an efficient alternative to the use of commonly prescribed antibiotics for the treatment of infectious mastitis during lactation.”