Those who have had a heart attack should never take a NSAID

Many people who have suffered a heart attack may be advised to take a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID, such as ibuprofen, Advil, Motrin, Aleve, Celebrex and others*) for a variety of reasons, but a nation-wide cohort study just published in the journal Circulation reports that taking an NSAID can significantly increase their risk of death and they should never do so even for short periods. The authors set the stage for their study:

“Despite the fact that nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are contraindicated among patients with established cardiovascular disease, many receive NSAID treatment for a short period of time. However, little is known about the association between NSAID treatment duration and risk of cardiovascular disease. We therefore studied the duration of NSAID treatment and cardiovascular risk in a nationwide cohort of patients with prior myocardial infarction (MI).”

They examined data for all Danish patients ≥30 years of age who had a first-time MI during 1997 to 2006 along with their subsequent NSAID use for risk of death and recurrent heart according to duration of NSAID treatment. What did the data show?

“Of the 83,677 patients included, 42.3% received NSAIDs during follow-up. There were 35 257 deaths/recurrent MIs. Overall, NSAID treatment was significantly associated with an increased risk of death/recurrent MI at the beginning of the treatment, and the risk persisted throughout the treatment course. Analyses of individual NSAIDs showed that the traditional NSAID diclofenac [Voltaren] was associated with the highest risk.”

This study is an alarm that should be clearly heard by clinicians and any heart attack survivors who self-medicate with over-the-counter preparations. Practitioners should also not fail to consider a corollary implication: what about patients who, though they have not yet suffered an MI, have significant heart attack risk factors such as elevated Lp-PLA2? Fortunately there are alternatives to NSAID use for chronic inflammation. The authors conclude:

Even short-term treatment with most NSAIDs was associated with increased risk of death and recurrent MI in patients with prior MI. Neither short- nor long-term treatment with NSAIDs is advised in this population, and any NSAID use should be limited from a cardiovascular safety point of view.”

*including Nuprin, Naproxen, Relafen, Tolectin, etc.

A role for vitamin K in the treatment of osteoarthritis

The importance of vitamin K for normal blood clotting and bone integrity in the prevention of osteoporosis is well known. There is also evidence for the importance of of vitamin K in the treatment of osteoarthritis. Consider research published in the journal Arthritis & Rheumatism in which the authors state:

Poor intake of vitamin K is common. Insufficient vitamin K can result in abnormal cartilage and bone mineralization. Furthermore, osteophyte growth, seen in osteoarthritis (OA), may be a vitamin K–dependent process. We undertook this study to determine whether vitamin K deficiency is associated with radiographic features of OA.”

They correlated radiographic (x-ray) findings with levels of phylloquinone (vitamin K) in 672 subjects, taking into consideration the degree of degenerative joint pathologies by prevalence ratios (PR) and variables such as vitamin D, bone mineral density, body mass index, age, etc. What did their data show?

“The PRs for OA, osteophytes, and JSN [joint space narrowing] and adjusted mean number of joints with all 3 features in the hand decreased significantly with increasing plasma phylloquinone level…For the knee, only the PR for osteophytes and the adjusted mean number of knee joints with osteophytes decreased significantly with increasing plasma phylloquinone levels.”

Thus their conclusion:

“These observational data support the hypothesis of an association between low plasma levels of vitamin K and increased prevalence of OA manifestations in the hand and knee.”

A clinical trial reported in the Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases highlights the practical importance of using objective laboratory tests to discriminate when may expect to see meaningful improvements from taking vitamin K (or any other intervention). The authors state:

“Vitamin K has bone and cartilage effects, and previously shown to be associated with radiographic osteoarthritis. We evaluated vitamin K’s effect on hand osteoarthritis in a randomised controlled trial.”

They observed the effects of vitamin K supplementation versus placebo on hand x-ray features of osteoarthritis regardless of their initial vitamin K status. Then they further examined a subgroup restricted to those that were vitamin K insufficient at baseline. Not surprisingly…

“There were no effects of randomisation to vitamin K for radiographic osteoarthritis outcomes.” BUT…”Those with insufficient vitamin K at baseline who attained sufficient concentrations at follow-up had trends towards 47% less joint space narrowing.

Another study published in the Journal of Orthopaedic Science takes a closer look at vitamin K intake associated with knee osteoarthritis:

“The present study sought to identify dietary nutrients associated with the prevalence of radiographic knee osteoarthritis (OA) in the Japanese elderly of a population-based cohort of the Research on Osteoarthritis Against Disability (ROAD) study.”

The authors analyzed a number of dietary factors and correlated them with the severity of radiographic (x-ray) osteoarthritic degenerative changes in the knees among 719 subjects. The association with vitamin K stood out in the data:

“Among the dietary factors, only vitamin K intake was shown to be inversely associated with the prevalence of radiographic knee OA by multivariate logistic regression analysis. The presence of joint space narrowing of the knee was also inversely associated with vitamin K intake. The prevalence of radiographic knee OA for each dietary vitamin K intake quartile decreased with the increased intake.”

We can also appreciate a paper published in the journal Osteoarthritis and Cartilage that examines a mechanism by which vitamin K deficiency contributes to degenerative joint disease (osteoarthritis). The authors observe:

“Mineralization has been observed in osteoarthritic cartilage but the mechanisms are incompletely understood. Vitamin K is an essential cofactor in post-translational modification of proteins where specific Glu residues become modified to Ca++ binding γ-carboxyglutamic acid residues (Gla). One such protein, matrix Gla protein (MGP), is a known mineralization inhibitor. This study determined if synthesis of MGP and formation of a fetuin–MGP protein complex was altered in chondrocytes and vesicles from osteoarthritis (OA) cartilage.”

They examined cartilage cells from osteoarthritic and normal joints to determine the presence of the fully γ-carboxylated form of MGP (cMGP) and non-γ-carboxylated MGP (ucMGP) as well as fetuin and MGP–fetuin complexes. This is significant because vitamin K is necessary for the production of cMGP and of the cMGP–fetuin complex, the absence of which results in the abnormal mineralization of cartilage. What did their data reveal?

“Chondrocytes and vesicles from osteoarthritic tissue produced significantly less cMGP compared to those from normal cartilage. This correlated with significantly less vitamin K-dependent γ-carboxylase enzyme activity in OA chondrocytes…A fetuin–MGP complex was identified in normal chondrocytes and in vesicles shed from these cells but not in OA cells or vesicles.”

Thus their conclusion puts the spotlight on an important vitamin K dependent mechanism  for maintaining joint cartilage:

“The absence of cMGP and of the cMGP–fetuin complex in OA cells and OA vesicles may be an important mechanism for increased mineralization of osteoarthritic cartilage.”

Clinicians and patients alike may ask the questions: Who will benefit from vitamin K supplementation and for whom will it not make a significant difference. How do we know, for each individual, what is the right amount? Measure it.

More evidence that glucosamine and chondroitin are ineffective

It would have been nice if glucosamine and chondroitin proved to be effective agents for promoting repair of joint cartilage in osteoarthritis, but we have more research published in the British Medical Journal in which they fail to show objective benefits. The authors set out to…

“…determine the effect of glucosamine, chondroitin, or the two in combination on joint pain and on radiological progression of disease in osteoarthritis of the hip or knee.”

They combined data from 10 trials on 3803 patients by network meta-analysis that graded pain intensity and changes in the minimal width of joint space. In order to be included each trial had to be large scale, including more than 200 patients, randomised and controlled; with osteoarthritis of the knee or hip that directly compared glucosamine, chondroitin, or their combination with placebo. What conclusion emerged when all the numbers were crunched?

“Compared with placebo, glucosamine, chondroitin, and their combination do not reduce joint pain or have an impact on narrowing of joint space.”

In the face of this and an earlier study showing similar results it is difficult to justify the recommendation of glucosamine or chondroitin for osteoarthritis. The authors’ observations included an interesting note. Though differences in pain and width of joint space all failed to cross the boundary of the ‘minimal clinically important difference’…

Industry independent trials showed smaller effects than commercially funded trials.”

Glucosamine not helpful for chronic low back pain

JAMAOptimizing the biochemical environment of a joint to support the pathways for cartilage repair can be beneficial but it doesn’t address the inflammatory component of joint and connective tissue disorders. A paper just published in JAMA (the Journal of the American Medical Association) looks for evidence of benefit from glucosamine, a precursor for cartilage synthesis, in chronic low back pain. The authors observe”

Chronic low back pain (LBP) with degenerative lumbar osteoarthritis (OA) is widespread in the adult population. Although glucosamine is increasingly used by patients with chronic LBP, little is known about its effect in this setting.”

To investigate the effect of glucosamine in patients with chronic LBP and degenerative lumbar OA they conducted a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial with 250 patients with chronic LBP (>6 months) and degenerative lumbar OA. The study subjects were given 1500 mg of oral glucosamine per day or placebo or 6 months, then assessed after 6 months and 1 year. What did the data show?

No statistically significant difference in change between groups was found when assessed after the 6-month intervention period and at 1 year.”

The evidence clearly points to this disappointing, but not surprising, conclusion:

Among patients with chronic LBP and degenerative lumbar OA, 6-month treatment with oral glucosamine compared with placebo did not result in reduced pain-related disability after the 6-month intervention and after 1-year follow-up.”

This brings to mind an earlier post on a study showing more benefit from glucosamine plus omega-3 fatty acids than glucosamine alone. The omega-3 FAs would, of course, help to reduce inflammation.

Leg length difference promotes knee arthritis

Annals of Internal MedicineThis study just published in the journal Annals of Internal Medicine made me want to slap my forehead in amazement at how long it takes common sense clinical experience to be absorbed into the mainstream. Here’s the set-up for the investigation:

Leg-length inequality is common in the general population and may accelerate development of knee osteoarthritis.”

Their objective:

“To determine whether leg-length inequality is associated with prevalent, incident, and progressive knee osteoarthritis.”

On a personal note, I have been ‘lecturing’ patients about this, and treating with good effect based on the sound physiology, for over 25 years. There is a tremendous biomechanical stress impact that batters the joints of the lower extremity and spine with a significant difference in leg length. What conclusion did the authors’ data lead them to?

“Radiographic leg-length inequality was associated with prevalent, incident symptomatic, and progressive knee osteoarthritis. Leg-length inequality is a potentially modifiable risk factor for knee osteoarthritis.”

Caution: treating this requires knowledge and experience because a clinically significant leg length inequality usually involves a combination of anatomical difference in the leg bones plus neuromuscular compensations. I find it takes a minimum of 3 weeks to verify the correctness of a therapeutic lift when combined with treatment that assists the body in making the numerous adjustments to the leg length correction.

Glucosamine sulfate more effective with omega-3 fatty acids

This study published recently in the journal Advances in Therapy compared glucosamine sulfate with omega-3 fatty acids (fish oil) to glucosamine sulfate given alone in the treatment of osteoarthritis (degenerative joint disease). Both were effective, but the combination was more effective for higher levels of pain and stiffness.

Oral hyaluronic acid rebuilds cartilage

There is evidence that hyaluronic acid, a natural constituent of joint and other connective tissue, can stimulate the cells that make cartilage (chondrocytes). The oral mucosa (tissue that lines the mouth) is rich in the CD44 cell surface receptors for hyaluronate, and lozenge delivery systems are now available that allow the hyaluronic acid to be absorbed orally.