The autoimmune aspect of hair loss

A fascinating study was just published in Medicinski arhiv (Medical Archives, Journal of the Academy of Medical Sciences of Bosnia and Herzegovina) that illuminates the type of autoimmune dysfunction involved in alopecia areata, a common cause of hair loss. The authors state:

Alopecia areata (AA) is a heterogeneous disease characterized by nonscarring hair loss on the scalp or other parts of the body. A wide range of clinical presentations can occur-from a single patch of hair loss (alopecia unilocularis, AUl), multiple patches (alopecia multilocularis, AM) to complete loss of hair on the scalp (alopecia totalis, AT) or the entire body (alopecia universalis, AU). The cause of AA is unknown although most evidence supports the hypothesis that AA is a T-cell mediated autoimmune disease of the hair follicle and that cytokines play an important role.”

The authors set out to evaluate serum concentrations of interferon-gamma (IFN-g, a major proinflammatory cytokine) in 60 patients with AA in comparison to 20 healthy subjects. They also investigated for an association between IFN-g and the clinical type of AA and duration of the disease. What did their data show?

“The serum concentration of IFN-g in patients with AA was significantly higher than that in the control group. Significantly elevated serum IFN-g were noticed in patients with AU type, especially those suffering from AT, compared with both patients with AUI and patients with AM clinical type. There was no significant difference in serum IFN-g concentration between patients with AUI and AM group, as well as between patients with AT and AU. No correlations were found between duration of disease and the serum levels of IFN-g.”

This clearly shows the autoimmune basis of hair loss in general and the role of IFN-g in particular. Autoimmune conditions require a functional approach that uses up-to-date methods to objectively define the underlying causal factors such as IFN-g for treatments that are targeted, physiological and rational. The authors conclude:

Our findings confirm previously published data that the Th1 type cytokine IFN-g is elevated in the serum of AA patients.

Changes in gut flora can ‘turn on’ autoimmune genes

A fascinating study just published in the journal Cell sheds light on how the genetic susceptibility to autoimmune disease can be activated by changes in gut flora, in this case the interaction of a virus with intestinal bacteria. The authors describe their findings:

“Here we demonstrate that an interaction between a specific virus infection and a mutation in the Crohn’s disease susceptibility gene Atg16L1 induces intestinal pathologies in mice…These pathologies triggered by virus-plus-susceptibility gene interaction were dependent on TNFα and IFNγ [pro-inflammatory cytokines] and were prevented by treatment with broad spectrum antibiotics. Thus, we provide a specific example of how a virus-plus-susceptibility gene interaction can, in combination with additional environmental factors and commensal bacteria, determine the phenotype [functional expression] of hosts carrying common risk alleles [genotype] for inflammatory disease.”

A perspective on this work published in Science Translational Medicine helps us to appreciate the significance of this research:

“…these findings link host genotype and viral infection with a response to chemical challenge, resulting in Crohn’s-like symptoms, a virus–plus–susceptibility gene interaction. However, the story gets even more complicated, because this interaction was shown to depend not only on the host inflammatory cytokines TNF-α and interferon-γ, but also on the gut microbiome…These findings are consistent with other models of IBD that are clearly dependent on the presence of gut bacteria and can be produced in germ-free mice colonized with defined bacterial consortia in the absence of a viral trigger.”

The practical message for the clinician and patient is that genetic susceptibility to an autoimmune disease can be triggered by alterations in the gut flora with compromise of the intestinal barrier (‘leaky gut’):

“These studies suggest that the microbiota is a key component of colitis; in mouse models, colitis develops in the context of abnormal adaptive or innate immune responses that fail to prevent translocation across the epithelial layer and the presentation of gut bacteria to immune cells ['leaky gut'], or result in excess activation of the adaptive immune system [dysregulated immune response].”

As we know, once these genes are ‘turned on’ they can’t be turned off. Autoimmune disease can be managed with the correct functional approach; the term ‘cure’ is not justified:

“A fascinating observation from Cadwell et al. is that susceptibility to colitis induction can be switched from off to on; mice in a colitis-resistant state before infection with the virus become susceptible to injury-induced colitis after viral infection, and, once the colitis-sensitive state is induced, cannot go back to a colitis-resistant state.”

Rational therapy that offers the chance to manage autoimmune disease for a much higher quality of life must address the microflora and their interactions with the human immune system along with other factors that modify the expression of the autoimmune potential:

“All of these diverse findings suggest that it is necessary to take into account multiple facets of the human microbiome when considering complex diseases such as Crohn’s. Polymorphisms in key susceptibility genes in our human genome, such as ATG16L1, may only serve to weaken the first link in the chain that protects the intestinal epithelia from a combination of viral infection, microbial stimulation of inflammation, and other dietary or xenobiotic factors.”

Laser therapy reduces inflammatory cytokines

Photomedicine and Laser SurgeryThe therapeutic use of non-invasive, low level (cold) laser and and infrared has not crossed the gap into clinical practice to the degree that the rich body of scientific research justifies. The laser and infrared therapies we use here appear to help even though you can’t feel them (at the time of application); but what evidence is there that they really do anything? And by what mechanisms? Consider this study published in the journal Photomedicine and Laser Surgery a few years ago that documents the effect of visible and infrared light on inflammatory cytokines (immune system messenger molecules). The authors state:

“The aim of this randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial was to investigate changes in the content of 10 cytokines in the human peripheral blood after transcutaneous [through the skin] and in vitro [to blood removed from the body] irradiation with polychromatic visible and infrared (IR) polarized light…”

The magnitude of the effect that they observed by just applying the light to the sacral area of the study subjects is surprising:

“A dramatic decrease in the level of pro-inflammatory cytokines TNF-α, IL-6, and IFN-γ was revealed: at 0.5 h after exposure of volunteers (with the initial parameters exceeding the norm), the cytokine contents fell, on average, 34, 12, and 1.5 times. The reduced concentrations of TNF-α and IL-6 were preserved after four daily exposures, whereas levels of IFN-γ and IL-12 decreased five and 15 times. At 0.5 h and at later times, the amount of anti-inflammatory cytokines was found to rise: that of IL-10 rose 2.7–3.5 times (in subjects with normal initial parameters) and of TGF-β1 1.4–1.5 times.”

But if you expose just the area over the sacrum, what happens when that blood mixes with the rest of the circulation?

Similar regularities of the light effects were recorded after in vitro irradiation of blood, as well as on mixing the irradiated and non-irradiated autologous blood at a volume ratio 1:10 (i.e., at modeling the events in a vascular bed of the exposed person when a small amount of the transcutaneously photomodified blood contacts its main circulating volume).”

In other words, a small limited application causes system-wide effects. Considering how much we need therapies that physiologically modulate the inflammatory response without side effects, the authors’ conclusion is extremely compelling:

Exposure of a small area of the human body to light leads to a fast decrease in the elevated pro-inflammatory cytokine plasma content and to an increase in the the anti-inflammatory factor concentration, which may be an important mechanism of the anti-inflammatory effect of phototherapy. These changes result from transcutaneous photomodification of a small volume of blood and a fast transfer of the light-induced changes to the entire pool of circulating blood [!].”

Here’s a little more from the large body of research published in the same journal:

By the way, this is interesting in connection with the earlier post on the infrared treatment of depression.