Sublingual feverfew and ginger combination can abort a migraine

It’s long been known that the herb feverfew (Tanacetum parthenium) can reduce the frequency and intensity of migraine attacks if taken ahead of time on a regular basis, but alternatives to triptan medications for acute application are in short supply. Therefore I’m glad to see a study just published in Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain offering evidence that the novel sublingual preparation of feverfew plus ginger LipiGesic M™ can rapidly abort or ameliorate a migraine headache. The authors state:

“Therapeutic needs of migraineurs vary considerably from patient to patient and even attack to attack. Some attacks require high-end therapy, while other attacks have treatment needs that are less immediate. While triptans are considered the “gold standard” of migraine therapy, they do have limitations and many patients are seeking other therapeutic alternatives. In 2005, an open-label study of feverfew/ginger suggested efficacy for attacks of migraine treated early during the mild headache phase of the attack.”

Pursuant to this they designed the double-bind placebo-controlled study reported here that included 60 patients who self-treated 221 attacks of migraine with either the sublingual feverfew/ginger preparation or placebo. Additionally…

“All subjects met International Headache Society criteria for migraine with or without aura, experiencing 2-6 attacks of migraine per month within the previous 3 months. Subjects had <15 headache days per month and were not experiencing medication overuse headache. Inclusion required that subjects were able to identify a period of mild headache in at least 75% of attacks. Subjects were required to be able to distinguish migraine from non-migraine headache.”

Subjects were randomized to receive either sublingual feverfew/ginger or a matching placebo, and told (but not required) to initiate treatment as soon as they recognized that a migraine was starting. What were the results?

“Sixty subjects treated 208 evaluable attacks of migraine over a 1-month period; 45 subjects treated 163 attacks with sublingual feverfew/ginger and 15 subjects treated 58 attacks with a sublingual placebo preparation…At 2 hours, 32% of subjects receiving active medication and 16% of subjects receiving placebo were pain-free. At 2 hours, 63% of subjects receiving feverfew/ginger found pain relief (pain-free or mild headache) vs 39% for placebo. Pain level differences on a 4-point pain scale for those receiving feverfew/ginger vs placebo were −0.24 vs −0.04 respectively. Feverfew/ginger was generally well tolerated with oral numbness and nausea being the most frequently occurring adverse event.”

This is clearly palliative treatment rather than therapy designed to address the underlying causes of migraine (see forthcoming posts regarding the functional medicine approach to migraine). However, an effective palliative that is wholesome and free of serious side-effects as implied in the authors’ conclusion is welcome news:

Sublingual feverfew/ginger appears safe and effective as a first-line abortive treatment for a population of migraineurs who frequently experience mild headache prior to the onset of moderate to severe headache.”

 

Does spinal manipulation do any good for chronic headache?

Spine JournalIs there any evidence that chiropractic adjustments help chronic headache? A study just published in The Spine Journal begins with the observation:

“Systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials suggest that spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) is efficacious for care of cervicogenic headache (CGH). The effect of SMT dose on outcomes has not been studied.”

Eighty patients with chronic cervicogenic (originating in the neck) headache were randomised for treatment with either spinal manipulation or massage therapy and their outcomes analyzed. What did the data show?

“There was an advantage for SMT over the control…For the higher dose patients, the advantage was greater. Patients receiving SMT were also more likely to achieve a 50% improvement in pain scale…Secondary outcomes showed similar trends favoring SMT. For SMT patients, the mean number of CGH was reduced by half.”

The conclusion:

“Clinically important differences between SMT and a control intervention were observed favoring SMT.”

Journal of Manipulative and Physiological TherapeuticsIn light of the importance of the role of cytokines such as TNF-α (tumor necrosis factor-alpha) in chronic inflammation, a case review recently published in the Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics that documents a marked improvement associated with recovery from cervicogenic headache has a result of SMT:

“Two patients with whiplash injury and disk herniation developed CHA (cervical headache) associated with very high TNF-α levels. After manipulative therapy, these patients became symptom-free, and their TNF-α levels decreased substantially.”

The study size is only two patients, but it’s consistent with the findings of another study published in the same journal that show the connection between recovery from headache by manual therapy and improvements in Heart Rate Variability (analysis of changes in the intervals between heartbeats that reveals autonomic nervous system function) and mood:

“The purpose of this study was to investigate the immediate effects of head-neck massage on heart rate variability (HRV), mood states, and pressure pain thresholds (PPTs) in patients with chronic tension-type headache (CTTH).”

Heart Rate Variability is a powerful indicator of the functional state of the part of the nervous system that automatically “runs” the internal organs and functions. Most chronic conditions are characterized by excessive activity of the sympathetic nervous system (SNS) and deficient parasympathetic nervous system (PSNS) resources and less overall variability (more rigidity). The author’s data led to this conclusion:

“The application of a single session of manual therapy program produces an immediate increase of index HRV and a decrease in tension, anger status, and perceived pain in patients with CTTH.”

This is impressive, and duplicates my own clinical experience with treatment and HRV analysis. These findings help establish the scientific basis for why people feel so much better after their treatments.