As clinicians and most lay readers know, healthy weight loss and weight maintenance require healthy insulin signaling. Insulin receptor resistance due to excessive glycemic stimulation results in higher compensatory insulin levels that force the storage of calories as fat. Inflammation also contributes to insulin resistance, with metabolic syndrome and its associated weight gain and eventual type 2 diabetes. A fascinating study just published in the journal Obesity describes how B cell-activating factor (BAFF) contributes to the development of insulin resistance. BAFF can be induced by food hypersensitivity and allergic reactions. The authors state:

“Visceral adipose tissue (VAT) inflammation has been linked to the pathogenesis of insulin resistance and metabolic syndrome. VAT has recently been established as a new component of the immune system and is involved in the production of various adipokines and cytokines. These molecules contribute to inducing and accelerating systemic insulin resistance. In this report, we investigated the role of B cell-activating factor (BAFF) in the induction of insulin resistance.”

They examined BAFF levels in the blood and visceral fat of obese mice, which they found to be increased compared to normal control mice…

“Next, we treated mice with BAFF to analyze its influence on insulin sensitivity. BAFF impaired insulin sensitivity in normal mice. Finally, we investigated the mechanisms underlying insulin resistance induced by BAFF in adipocytes. BAFF also induced alterations in the expression levels of genes related to insulin resistance in adipocytes. In addition, BAFF directly affected the glucose uptake and phosphorylation of insulin receptor substrate-1 in adipocytes.”

In other words, BAFF not only directly induced insulin resistance, but altered the expression of genes related to insulin receptor function and fat inflammatory cytokine (adipokine) production. The authors concluded:

“We propose that autocrine or paracrine BAFF and BAFF-receptor (BAFF-R) interaction in VAT leads to impaired insulin sensitivity via inhibition of insulin signaling pathways and alterations in adipokine production.”

We can also appreciate an earlier paper published in the journal Experimental & Molecular Medicine that also identifies BAFF as an adipokine that links inflammation with obesity. The authors state:

“In the current study, we verified that BAFF expression is increased during adipocyte differentiation…We sought to identify known BAFF receptors (BAFF-R, BCMA, and TACI) in adipocytes, and determined that all three were present and upregulated during adipocyte differentiation…BAFF-R and BCMA expression levels were upregulated under pro-inflammatory conditions…”

They also demonstrated that the BAFF receptors BAFF-R and BCMA were downregulated by rosigliatazone treatment. (Rosigliatzone, trade name Avandia, is a thiazolidinedione type anti-diabetic drug with anti-inflammatory properties whose use has been complicated by serious side effects.) In other words, inflammation associated with BAFF signaling promoted insulin resistance and obesity. The authors conclude:

“Taken together, our results suggest that BAFF may be a new adipokine, representing a link between obesity and inflammation.”

Incidentally, as the authors of a review just published in the Journal of Clinical Investigation note, obesity-associated inflammation has serious global effects:

“The obesity epidemic has forced us to evaluate the role of inflammation in the health complications of obesity…The reframing of obesity as an inflammatory condition has had a wide impact on our conceptualization of obesity-associated diseases.”

Moreover…

“The chronic nature of obesity produces a tonic low-grade activation of the innate immune system that affects steady-state measures of metabolic homeostasis over time…While transient inflammatory states such as sepsis can have multi-organ effects, few other chronic inflammatory diseases are characterized by the features of pancreatic, liver, adipose, heart, brain, and muscle inflammation as is seen in obesity.”

Clinicians should never overlook the role of the gut-associated immune tissue (GALT) in disorders of chronic inflammation. A paper just published in Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition & Metabolic Care highlights this in the link between intestinal inflammation, obesity and insulin resistance. The authors state:

“Current views suggest that obesity-associated systemic and adipose tissue inflammation promote insulin resistance, which underlies many obesity-linked health risks. Diet-induced changes in gut microbiota also contribute to obesity…”

They go on to summarize…

“…the evidence supporting a role of intestinal inflammation in diet-induced obesity and insulin resistance and discusses mechanisms.”

Of course, food allergy and hypersensitivity are major causes of intestinal inflammation. Regrettably, many practitioners may wrongly assume that the phenomenon of inflammation triggered by food sensitivity is limited to the classically defined IgE-mediated acute hypersensitivity reaction. In fact, there are a number of pathways by which food sensitivity can elicit an inflammatory response. A very important study just published in Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics makes this clear in regard to BAFF, which we now understand to be linked to obesity and insulin resistance. The authors first note that…

“Medically confirmed hypersensitivity reactions to food are usually IgE-mediated. Non-IgE-mediated reactions are not only seldom recognized but also more difficult to diagnose.”

They set out to…

“…examine B cell-activating factor (BAFF) in serum and gut lavage fluid of patients with self-reported food hypersensitivity, and to study its relationship to atopic disease.”

So they examined the gut lavage fluid obtained from 60 patients with self-reported food hypersensitivity and the serum from 17 others. From 20 healthy control subjects they obtained gut lavage fluid, along with serum from 11 of them. They then measured BAFF in both serum and the gut lavage fluid. Their findings are most interesting:

“B cell-activating factor levels in serum and gut lavage fluid were significantly higher in patients than in controls…There was no significant correlation between serum levels of BAFF and IgE.”

In other words, patients with food hypersensitivity produced significantly higher levels of BAFF–and IgE failed as an indicator of BAFF associated inflammation with food hypersensitivity. The authors add in their conclusion:

“The results suggest that BAFF might be a new mediating mechanism in food hypersensitivity reactions. Significantly higher levels in non-atopic compared with atopic patients, and no correlation between BAFF and IgE, suggest that BAFF might be involved particularly in non-IgE-mediated reactions.”

Unfortunately, food hypersensitivity is too often dismissed by many in the medical community as a poorly understood phenomenon that ends up being ignored in clinical practice. A clinical study review recently published in the Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology investigates this issue and observes the role of BAFF:

“Perceived food hypersensitivity is a prevalent, but poorly understood condition. In this review article, we summarize narratively recent literature including results of our 10 years’ interdisciplinary research program dealing with such patients.”

The studies included more than 400 adults who were referred to a university hospital because of gastrointestinal complaints that they attributed to food hypersensitivity. Most not only fulfilled criteria for irritable bowel syndrome…

“…In addition, most suffered from several extra-intestinal health complaints and had considerably impaired quality of life.”

Sadly…

“Despite extensive examinations, food allergy was seldom diagnosed…However, psychological factors could explain only approximately 10% of the variance in the patients’ symptom severity and 90% of the variance thus remained unexplained.”

Moreover…

“Intolerance to low-digestible carbohydrates was a common problem and abdominal symptoms were replicated by carbohydrate ingestion. A considerable number of patients showed evidence of immune activation by analyses of B-cell activating factor, dendritic cells and “IgE-armed” mast cells.”

Atopic dermatitis (the most common form or eczema, also linked to food sensitivity) has been shown to be associated with high levels of B cell-activating factor (BAFF) in a paper published not long ago in the journal Clinical and Experimental Dermatology. In order to investigate the role of BAFF in serum of patients with atopic dermatitis (AD)…

“Levels of serum BAFF, a proliferation-inducing ligand (APRIL) and total serum IgE level, and total eosinophil count were measured in 245 children.”

Their data showed a distinct association:

“Patients were characterized as having atopic eczema (AE); the remainder were healthy control subjects. Serum BAFF level in children with AE was significantly higher than in non-AE children or healthy controls.“

Not surprisingly considering immune function in the common mucosal barrier system, there is also evidence that B-cell activating factor is induced by airborne hypersensitivity reactions. A study published in The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology documents the increased production of BAFF in the airway tissues after exposure to antigen.  The authors state:

“The objective of this study was to investigate the production of B cell-activating factor of the TNF family (BAFF), an important regulator of B cell survival and immunoglobulin class switch recombination, in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid after segmental allergen challenge (SAC) of allergic subjects.”

They measured the amount of B cell-active cytokines including BAFF in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid after 16 adult allergic subjects where challenged with allergens or saline. The data showed a clear result:

“BAFF protein was significantly elevated in BAL fluid after allergen challenge compared with those at saline sites…BAFF levels were also significantly correlated with other B cell-activating cytokines, IL-6 and IL-13.”

As in the gut, inflammation due to allergen exposure elevated BAFF levels. The authors conclude:

“These findings imply that exposure to antigen in the airway activates a process that stimulates the release of cytokines, including BAFF and others, that are known to promote CSR [class switch recombination = a change in antibody production by B cells] and immunoglobulin synthesis by B cells.”

Finally, B cell-activating factor expression due to gluten sensitivity deserves special mention because of the insidious and distinctively injurious nature of gluten reactions. An interesting study published in the Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology investigates this phenomenon, while referring to the link between celiac disease, BAFF and lymphoma. The authors state:

“The B cell-activating factor of the tumour necrosis factor (TNF) family (BAFF) was recently described as a critical survival factor for B cells, and its expression is increased in several autoimmune diseases. Abnormal production of BAFF disturbs immune tolerance allowing the survival of autoreactive B cells and participates in the progression of B-cell lymphomas. Coeliac disease (CD) is a common autoimmune disorder induced by gluten intake in genetically predisposed individuals, associated with autoantibody production and with an increased risk of lymphoma at follow-up. The purpose of this study was to investigate the possible implications of BAFF in CD.”

They examined serum BAFF levels, anti-transglutaminase (a-tTG) and endomysial antibodies in 73 patients with celiac disease confirmed by biopsy and laboratory tests before starting a gluten free diet (GFD), while using 77 blood donors as controls. Their data painted a most interesting and dramatic picture:

“Serum BAFF levels appeared to be significantly more elevated in CD patients than in controls and, compared with other autoimmune diseases where BAFF is increased, a much larger percentage (80.8%) of CD patients presented BAFF levels above the normal range. In addition, serum BAFF levels were found to correlate with a-tTG antibody levels…”

And happily…

“…there was a significant reduction of BAFF after introduction of a GFD [gluten-free diet].”

To summarize the significance for obesity and weight loss:

1. B cell-activating factor (BAFF), triggered by food hypersensitivity and other allergic reactions, is associated with inflammation .
2. BAFF induces insulin resistance; the resultant higher levels of insulin force the storage of calories of fat, promoting weight gain and obesity.
3. A sucessful and physiologically sound weight loss and maintenance program should have a strategy to control inflammation and BAFF signaling. This includes the diagnosis of food allergy or sensitivity, with special emphasis on proper screening for reactions to gluten.

-

Our understanding of the autoimmune basis of Sjögren’s syndrome has evolved in the past several years, and this is offering new considerations for rational therapy that go beyond the old standard of care with its disappointing results. The authors of a paper recently published in the journal Arthritis Research & Therapy state:

“In vitro and in vivo experimental data have pointed to new immunopathogenic mechanisms in primary Sjögren’s syndrome (pSS). The availability of targeted treatment modalities has opened new ways to selectively target these mechanistic pathways in vivo. This has taught us that the role of proinflammatory cytokines, in particular TNFα, is not crucial in the immunopathogenesis of pSS. B cells appear to play a major role, as depletion of B cells leads to restoration of salivary flow and is efficacious for treatment of extraglandular manifestations and mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma. B cells also orchestrate T-cell infiltration and ductal epithelial dearrangement in the salivary glands. Gene profiling of salivary gland tissue in relation to B-cell depletion confirms that the axis of IFNα, B-cell activating factor, B-cell activation, proliferation and survival constitutes a major pathogenic route in pSS.”

B cells are a kind of white blood cell (lymphocyte) that, when stimulated by an antigen, turn into plasma cells that produce antibodies that further attack that antigen. This is part of the humoral (versus cell-mediated) or Th2 (versus Th1) immune response. In addition to interferon alpha (IFNα) and B-cell activating factor, a study published in Clinical Immunology details the role of interleukin-14 alpha (IL-14a) in Sjögren’s syndrome. The authors state:

“To evaluate the role of interleukin 14 alpha (IL-14a) in Sjögren’s syndrome (SS), we evaluated the expression of IL-14a in the peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBL) of patients with primary and secondary SS and normal controls by quantitative RT-PCR.”

They concomitantly examined transgenic IL-14a mice for both tissue and immune characteristics of Sjögren’s syndrome. Interestingly…

“Patients with both primary and secondary Sjögren’s syndrome expressed IL-14a at statistically higher levels in their peripheral blood compared to normal controls matched for age, sex and ethnic group. Transgenic mice in which IL-14a expression was increased constitutively were previously demonstrated to develop…all the clinical and immunological features of primary Sjögren’s disease…Thus IL-14a is important in the pathophysiology of Sjögren’s disease.”

IL-14 alpha is a Th2 type cytokine that promotes B cell proliferation and maintenance. Based on these and related findings the use of biological therapy has emerged as a focus for treatment. (Biological therapy modulates immune system activity, often using agents that act as biological response modifiers.) Efforts have been made to exploit this understanding as documented in a paper published last year in Autoimmunity Reviews:

“”Conventional therapy (moisturizers, pilocarpine, Cevimeline, local Cyclosporine, and hydroxychloroquine) remains the basis for the treatment of primary Sjögren’s syndrome (pSS) but they do not modify the course of the disease. Rituximab is currently the most fully evaluated biologics in pSS. Open-label studies suggest that Rituximab is well tolerated (although infusion-related reactions and serum sickness remain possible), induces a rapid depletion of B cells in the blood and salivary glands, and could improve early active pSS or pSS with active extra glandular involvement. Two small double blind randomized studies have been conducted and now published, demonstrating its efficacy on fatigue and sicca syndrome in early disease.”

Two larger studies were underway at the time the paper came out, and a paper just published in Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy reviews the evidence available at this time in regard to Sjögren’s syndrome:

“Primary Sjögren’s syndrome (PSS) is a relatively common immune-mediated condition characterized by oral and ocular dryness, fatigue, musculoskeletal pain and poor health-related quality of life. Other extra-glandular organs can also be affected and PSS is associated with a markedly increased risk of lymphoma. Furthermore, the health-economic cost for PSS is substantial. There is currently no effective treatment available. With better understanding of the pathophysiology of PSS and advances in technologies, it is now possible to develop biological therapies to target specific molecules or molecular pathways that are important in PSS pathogenesis. Indeed, a limited number of biological therapies have already been tested in PSS with mixed successes.”

However, biological agents such as rituximab are not easy manage and come with the potential for serious side effects when B-cell activity, necessary for normal immunity, is blocked with a ‘blunt instrument’. findings suggest that we shouldn’t be ‘putting all our eggs in one basket’. An overview of reviews published in the highly respected Cochrane Library highlights the concerns:

“Biologics are used for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and many other conditions. While the efficacy of biologics has been established, there is uncertainty regarding the adverse effects of this treatment. Since serious risks such as tuberculosis (TB) reactivation, serious infections, and lymphomas may be common to the biologics but occur in small numbers across the various indications, we planned to combine the results from biologics used in many conditions to obtain the much needed risk estimates.”

The authors investigated adverse effects from a number of biologics including tumor necrosis factor blocker (etanercept, adalimumab, infliximab, golimumab, certolizumab), interleukin (IL)-1 antagonist (anakinra), IL-6 antagonist (tocilizumab), anti-CD28 (abatacept), and anti-B cell (rituximab) associated with 163 randomized controlled trials comprising 50,010 participants, and 46 extension studies with 11,954 more participants. Their data sound a cautionary note:

“Adjusted for dose, biologics as a group were associated with a statistically significant higher rate of total adverse events, number needed to treat to harm (NNTH) and withdrawals due to adverse events and an increased risk of TB reactivation compared to control.”

Clinicians may wish to read the paper in its entirety to see the differences in this regard between the various biologics. The authors conclude:

“Overall, in the short term biologics were associated with significantly higher rates of total adverse events, withdrawals due to adverse events and TB reactivation. Some biologics had a statistically higher association with certain adverse outcomes compared to control, but there was no consistency across the outcomes so caution is needed in interpreting these results…There is an urgent need for more research regarding the long-term safety of biologics and the comparative safety of different biologics.”

What else can we do to modulate the course of the disease? Identifying and removing agents that trigger and amplify the inflammatory autoimmune activity is an important consideration. Abundant evidence has accumulated linking Sjögren’s syndrome with gluten sensitivity. A study published in The American Journal of Gastroenterology draws attention to this association:

“Many autoimmune diseases occur concomitantly with celiac disease. We investigated prospectively the occurrence of celiac disease and small-bowel mucosal inflammation in patients with primary Sjögren’s syndrome.”

Clinicians know that when autoimmune activity has been set in motion there is rarely only one tissue target for the inflammatory attack. The authors examined 34 patients with primary Sjögren’s syndrome and 28 controls by small bowel biopsy, the presence of intraepithelial lymphocytes (white blood cells within the intestinal lining), DQA and DQB genes for gluten sensitivity, serum antiendomysial and antigliadin antibodies. I find their data to be of special significance:

“Five (14.7%) of 34 Sjögren’s syndrome patients were found to have celiac disease. The density of jejunal intraepithelial γδ+ T cells was increased in all celiac and in four nonceliac patients. All celiac patients, 69% of nonceliac Sjögren’s syndrome patients, and 11% of control subjects showed enhanced HLA-DR expression. HLA DQ2 was present in 19 (56%) patients with Sjögren’s syndrome, including all five with celiac disease.“

A critical point is embedded here: non-celiac autoimmune manifestations of gluten sensitivity have become very common. While a modest percentage of the Sjögren’s syndrome cohort had the celiac disease ‘version’ of gluten sensitivity, most showed activation of the HLA-DR and DQ genes expressing gluten sensitivity. The authors concluded:

“The findings show a close association between Sjögren’s syndrome and celiac disease. Even among nonceliac patients with primary Sjögren’s syndrome, an ongoing inflammation is often present in the small bowel mucosa.”

Research published in the Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology adds more evidence to the connection between gluten sensitivity and Sjögren’s syndrome, while cautioning that the gastrointestinal symptoms of celiac disease may not be present. The authors set out to…

“…evaluate the rectal mucosal response to gluten as an indication of gluten sensitivity in patients with primary Sjögren’s syndrome (pSS).”

They exposed the rectal tissue of 20 patients with Sjögren’s syndrome and 18 controls to wheat gluten. Fifteen hours later they measured the mucosal tissue release of nitric oxide (NO). What did they find?

“Five patients with pSS had a significant increase in the luminal release of NO after the rectal gluten challenge, indicating gluten sensitivity. All were HLA-DQ2 and/or -DQ8-positive. Two of the patients with increased NO had antibodies against transglutaminase and a duodenal biopsy showed an absolutely flat mucosa consistent with coeliac disease in one of the patients. Before gluten challenge, 15 of the Sjögren’s syndrome (SS) patients reported gastrointestinal symptoms, and 8 reported intolerance to various food products. No correlation was found between gluten sensitivity and self-reported food intolerance or gastrointestinal symptoms.“

Note again the last point that gluten sensitivity can manifest as an attack on a wide variety of tissue targets without gastrointestinal symptoms. The authors concluded:

“Rectal mucosal inflammatory response after gluten challenge is often seen in patients with pSS, signifying gluten sensitivity. However, this reactivity is not necessarily linked to coeliac disease.“

The authors of a paper recently published in the Romanian Journal of Internal Medicine also comment:

“Celiac disease (CD) is an immune mediated enteropathy with an increasing prevalence worldwide…The clinically silent form affects the majority of patients. Hence, diarrhea, nutritional deficiencies and weight loss are symptoms which are not very often seen.“

They further state:

“The high risk groups have been identified to be those patients suffering from autoimmune insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, osteoporosis, Sjogren’s syndrome and the first degree relatives of CD patients. Those patients should be screened for CD. The association of CD with several autoimmune ailments has various explanations ranging from common genotypes to systemic immune reactions triggered by food antigens.“

A case report published in the journal Zeitshrift für Rheumatologie is worth noting in this context. The authors state:

“We report on a 26 year old woman with dermatitis herpetiformis Duhring, diagnosed at 10 years of age, who developed arthritis, symptoms of celiac disease, and Sjögren’s syndrome 15 years later. Clinical symptoms, biopsies of duodenal mucosa and salivary glands as well as serological findings established the diagnoses.”

Most importantly…

“Gluten-free diet alleviated severity of clinical symptoms very quickly indicating the basic pathology of celiac enteropathy in the immunological disorders.”

A study published in the journal Clinical & Experimental Allergy alerts us to the fact that other food sensitivities can be involved with Sjögren’s syndrome, in this case cow’s milk protein. The authors note:

“Patients with primary Sjögren’s syndrome (pSS) are reported to have a variety of gastrointestinal symptoms partly attributed to an overrepresentation of celiac disease. We have observed that irritable bowel syndrome (IBS)-like symptoms are frequent complaints in this patient group. Allergic manifestations to various drugs are also common in pSS. A role of food allergy in IBS has been proposed.“

In this case the investigators examined the mucosal response to a rectal challenge with cow’s milk protein (CM) in 21 patients with pSS and 18 healthy controls. Fifteen hours later they measured the mucosal production of nitric oxide (NO) and the release of myeloperoxidase (MPO) as indicators of a mucosal inflammatory reaction. They found that a significant percentage of Sjögren’s syndrome subjects react to cow’s milk protein:

“Eight out of 21 patients with pSS had a definite increase of mucosal NO synthesis and the luminal release of MPO after rectal CM challenge.”

Interestingly…

“This sign of milk sensitivity was not linked to IgG/IgA antibodies to milk proteins.“

Consider the clinical significance that there was an inflammatory response to cow’s milk protein challenge in the absence of IgG and IgA antibodies. Furthermore…

“All patients who were CM sensitive suffered from IBS. In a small open study, patients reactive to CM reported an improvement of intestinal symptoms on a CM-free diet.”

The authors conclude:

“A rectal mucosal inflammatory response after CM challenge is seen in 38% of patients with pSS as a sign of CM sensitivity. IBS-like symptoms were common in pSS, linked to CM sensitivity.”

Taken together, this evidence suggests that it is very important for practitioners and patients both not to overlook the potential role of gluten and other food sensitivities as a causative factor in Sjögren’s syndrome. Clinicians should note that a laboratory panel that does not include the full range of anti-gliadin and transaminase antibodies can be misleading and are urged to employ one that does. The scope of this post does not encompass the use of evidence-based natural agents to modulate immune system function within the functional medicine approach; practitioners are welcome to comment on this post or contact me personally for discussion. But I’ll wrap this up with a study published not long ago in the journal Rheumatology in which the authors set out to…

“…investigate the immunomodulating role of fat-soluble vitamins in 25 patients with primary SS (pSS) and 15 healthy individuals…Nutritional defects, including vitamin deficiencies, are commonly associated with impaired immune responses…”

They measured plasma levels of vitamins A, D and E; natural killer [NK] T cells, T-cell subsets, B cells, IL-10 producing Tr1 cells, CD4+CD25+ Treg cells and Th17 cells, along with a number of Th1- and Th2-soluble and intracytoplasmic cytokines(IFN-γ, IL-4, -10 and -17. They then drew correlations between vitamin levels and immunological and clinical parameters.

“Vitamin A levels did not differ between patients and controls, yet in patients with extraglandular manifestations (EGMs) a significant decrease in vitamin A levels was apparent compared with pSS patients without EGMs. Vitamin E levels were increased in patients compared with controls, whereas vitamin D levels were similar in pSS and control subjects. In patients, vitamin A showed a positive correlation with both NK cell and Th17 cell, and a negative correlation with Schirmer’s test values [Schirmer’s test determines whether the eye produces enough tears to keep it moist.]. Positive correlation was found between vitamin E and NK cells, Th1 cells and the Th1/Th2 ratio. In the control group, we found correlation between vitamin E and serum IL-10 levels [immunoregulating].”

The authors sum up the significance of this in their conclusion:

“Our data suggest that fat-soluble vitamins may be important in immunoregulatory processes in patients with pSS.“

-

Most practitioners and parents think of type 2 diabetes (T2DM) as a metabolic disorder that emerges when the pancreas can no longer keep up with the increasing need for insulin as receptor resistance grows worse. There is growing evidence that T2DM in children and adults is in many cases complicated by the same autoimmune phenomena as in type 1 diabetes. A study just published in the journal Diabetes Care adds to the evidence. The authors set out to:

“…determine the frequency of islet cell autoimmunity in youth clinically diagnosed with type 2 diabetes and describe associated clinical and laboratory findings.”

They screened 1,206 children ages (10-17) who were known to have type 2 diabetes for GAD-65 and insulinoma-associated protein 2 autoantibodies using the new National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases/National Institutes of Health (NIDDK/NIH) standardized assays, performed physical examinations, and measured fasting lipids, C-peptide, and HgbA1C. What did the data show?

“Of the 1,206 subjects screened and considered clinically to have type 2 diabetes, 118 (9.8%) were antibody positive…Diabetes autoantibody (DAA) positivity was significantly associated with race, with positive subjects more likely to be white (40.7 vs. 19% and male (51.7 vs. 35.7%. BMI, BMI z score, C-peptide, A1C, triglycerides, HDL cholesterol, and blood pressure were significantly different by antibody status. The antibody-positive subjects were less likely to display characteristics clinically associated with type 2 diabetes and a metabolic syndrome phenotype…”

A clinical ‘pearl’ embedded here is that if a youth with T2DM does not have the characteristics of metabolic syndrome (overweight, etc.), there is strong suspicion of an autoimmune component to their condition. This must, however, be determined by a blood test for the autoantibodies. The authors conclude:

“Obese youth with a clinical diagnosis of type 2 diabetes may have evidence of islet autoimmunity contributing to insulin deficiency. As a group, patients with DAA have clinical characteristics significantly different from those without DAA. However, without islet autoantibody analysis, these characteristics cannot reliably distinguish between obese young individuals with type 2 diabetes and those with autoimmune diabetes.”

-

GAD (glutamic acid decarboxylase) antibodies are expressed in type 1 (autoimmune) diabetes, adrenal failure (Addison disease), autoimmune thyroid diseases, premature ovarian failure, myasthenia gravis, pernicious anemia, Stiff-man syndrome and a number of other disorders. An informative study recently published in Acta Neurologica Scandinavica documents the link between these conditions and gluten sensitivity. The authors state:

“The high prevalence of gluten sensitivity in patients with stiff-person syndrome (SPS) lead us to investigate the relationship between gluten sensitivity and GAD-antibody-associated diseases.”

They used ELISA assays for GAD antibodies and serological markers of gluten sensitivity that generated compelling data:

“”Six of seven (86%) patients with SPS were positive for anti-GAD…This compared with 9/90 (11%) patients with idiopathic sporadic ataxia…16/40 (40%) patients with gluten ataxia…and 6/10 patients with type 1 diabetes only…”

Note that the serological tests for gluten sensitivity are a blunt instrument—only 40% of confirmed cases of gluten ataxia were recognized. The abundance of false negatives is why the gluten gene sensitivity test is so valuable.

Additionally, the authors found that…

“The titre of anti-GAD reduced following the introduction of a gluten-free diet in patients with SPS who had serological evidence of gluten sensitivity.”

Their conclusion is simply stated:

“These findings suggest a link between gluten sensitivity and GAD antibody-associated diseases.“

This study is especially interesting in connection with earlier research published in the journal Psychiatry. The authors set out to investigate the role of GAD antibodies in schizophrenia and related disorders:

“We hypothesized that GAD antibodies are increased in patients with chronic psychotic disorders. The aim of this pilot study was to compare the level of GAD antibodies in patients with chronic psychotic disorders with normal controls.”

By way of background they note that:

“The role of GABAergic neurotransmission in epilepsy, anxiety disorders, schizophrenia, and premenstrual dysphoric disorder has been a subject of some recent investigations. Absence of structural abnormalities in the brains of most patients with chronic psychotic disorders has always raised suspicion for an alternative pathogenesis and a possible functional disturbance at the neuronal/cellular level. Glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD)…is involved in the formation of gamma aminobutyric acid (GABA) a central inhibitory neurotransmitter of the nervous system. Antibodies to GAD may impair GABA formation or inhibitory function.“

What did the data show?

“Serum levels of GAD antibodies in 12 patients with chronic psychotic disorders (schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorders) and 10 age-matched healthy control subjects were evaluated… Antibodies to GAD in patients with chronic psychotic disorders have a higher mean than nonpatient control individuals.”

The authors’ conclusion alerts the practitioner to be on the lookout:

“Antibodies to GAD65 are peripherally present in patients with chronic psychotic disorders (schizophrenia/schizoaffective disorders)... The presence of such antibodies also suggests a possible role for autoimmune mechanism in the pathogenesis of these disorders. In summary, from a practicing psychiatrist’s point of view, measurements of antibodies to GAD65 could potentially be used to screen for chronic psychotic disorders and for diabetes mellitus very early on in the disease process.”

GAD (glutamic acid decarboxylase) produces GABA, the most abundant inhibitory (calming) neurotransmitter in the body. Suboptimal levels can manifest as anxiety, insomnia, hyperarousal, panic, feeling overwhelmed, disorganized attention, restlessness, worry, tension, inner excitability, inability to relax, etc.

-

Often tests shows anti-gliadin antibodies (AGA; gliadin is the immunoreactive component of gluten) in the absence of celiac disease but with various autoimmune conditions representing the non-celiac manifestations of gluten sensitivity. The authors of a study just published in the Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology explore this issue for the elderly.

“…data suggest that AGA positivity [without celiac disease] might be related to distinct disease entities such as allergy and gluten ataxia (loss of muscular coordination with unsteady movements and gait). Our aim here is to explore the clinical relevance of positive AGA in the elderly population.”

The authors correlated positive lab tests for gluten sensitivity with the incidence of depression and rheumatoid arthritis in 2815 individuals aged 52–74 years. What did their data show?

“Rheumatoid arthritis and depression were found significantly more often in AGA-positives than controls. The significance remained even when tTGA-positive and known celiac disease cases were excluded.”

Don’t forget that anti-gliadin antibody tests are not an absolute screen for gluten (or any other food) sensitivity because there are a number of factors that can suppress the expression of antibodies at the time of specimen collection. However, this study shows that if an elderly person is suffering from depression or rheumatoid arthritis the possibility of gluten sensitivity should be investigated.

-

This insightful paper just published in the journal Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology sheds light on why some patients may have persistent diarrhea even when they have no infection, are avoiding allergic foods, and not under unusual stress. The authors begin by observing…

“Patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) might have other underlying pathologies. Pancreatic disease can be elusive—especially in the early stages, and some symptoms overlap with those of IBS. We evaluated the prevalence of exocrine pancreatic insufficiency in diarrhea-predominant IBS (D-IBS) and assessed the effects of pancreatic enzyme supplementation.”

Their study compared patients with chronic diarrhea who met the criteria for D-IBS with a control group without diarrhea for stool frequency, stool consistency and fecal elastase-1 (Fel-1, also called pancreatic elastase 1), a definitive metric for the production of pancreatic digestive enzymes. What did their data show?

“Fel-1 levels were less than 100 μg/g in stool from 19 of 314 patients with D-IBS (6.1%)…and none of 95 controls. After enzyme supplementation, improvements in stool frequency and abdominal pain were observed in patients in group 1 (D-IBS, but not in group 2.”

This result shows that pancreatic enzyme insufficiency may not be the most common cause of chronic diarrhea but it is important to not overlook.

“Pancreatic exocrine insufficiency was detected in 6.1% of patients who fulfilled the Rome II criteria for D-IBS. In these patients, pancreatic enzyme therapy might reduce diarrhea and abdominal pain. Pancreatic exocrine insufficiency should be considered in patients with D-IBS.”

How reliable is fecal pancreatic elastase for diagnosing exocrine (secreting directly or through a duct) pancreatic enzyme deficiency? The authors of this study published in the Journal of Gastroenterology asked the same question. Their conclusion:

“Fecal pancreatic elastase is a reproducible marker for severe exocrine pancreatic insufficiency. This test is valuable for longitudinal follow-up of exocrine pancreatic function.”

This is convenient because fecal pancreatic elastase is part of our regular gastrointestinal function profile. But we still have to ask, “What are the underlying causes of the loss of ability for the pancreas to produce adequate digestive enzymes?” Besides well-known conditions including cystic fibrosis and certain malignancies, idiopathic (cause unknown) chronic pancreatitis (ICP) is a big category. How often may this be an autoimmune condition?

The authors of another paper published earlier in Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology looked into this.

“The proportion of patients with idiopathic chronic pancreatitis (ICP) that have an autoimmune origin is unknown. Three forms of ICP have been described: pseudotumoral, duct-destructive, and usual chronic pancreatitis. The aim of this study was to identify autoimmune stigmata in the 3 forms.”

What did their data show?

“Clinical or biochemical autoimmune stigmata are present in 40% of patients with ICP. Autoimmune mechanisms may be frequent in idiopathic pancreatitis.”

Readers here will not be surprised by this fact considering how common autoimmune conditions have become. Is this a concern for the many people who are sensitive to gluten? Is it possible for people with gluten sensitivity to have persistent diarrhea due to pancreatic insufficiency even after they are no longer eating gluten? The authors of this paper published in the journal Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics asked that question having been compelled by this observation:

“Patients with coeliac disease may have diarrhoea despite being on a gluten-free diet.”

They set about their investigation with this aim:

“To assess whether exocrine pancreatic insufficiency causes persisting symptoms compared with controls, we determined whether pancreatic enzyme supplementation provided symptomatic benefit in coeliac patients with chronic diarrhoea.”

What conclusion did their data lead them to?

“Low faecal elastase is common in patients with coeliac disease and chronic diarrhoea, suggesting exocrine pancreatic insufficiency. In this group of patients, pancreatic enzyme supplementation may provide symptomatic benefit.”

Importantly, they also observed that stool frequency reduced from 4 times per day to 1 time per day in 18 of 20 subjects who were given pancreatic enzyme supplementation.

If you’re thinking now that the pancreas is one of the many possible targets for an autoimmune attack with gluten sensitivity, yet another paper published in Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology would confirm your suspicion. Elevated pancreatic enzymes in the serum result from destruction of pancreas cells…

“We demonstrated a frequency of about 25% of elevated pancreatic enzymes values in CD (celiac disease) patients, including subjects without gastrointestinal manifestations and apparently asymptomatic subjects. The finding of elevated serum amylase or lipase level, in the absence of signs of pancreatic disease, would appear to suggest a need to screen for celiac disease.”

Another paper published in the World Journal of Gastroenterology reviews the various causes of idiopathic pancreatitis and agrees:

“Intriguingly, recurrent pancreatitis can be caused by celiac disease. The mechanism appears to be duodenal inflammation and associated papillary stenosis causing pancreatitis.”

Important: Consuming gluten for years without knowing (or ignoring) that you have a gluten sensitivity can result in the irretrievable loss of tissues subject to autoimmune attack and their function (such as the cells of the pancreas that produce enzymes). The sooner you find out and adhere to avoidance the better.

-

As the authors of this paper published in the journal Minerva Ginecologica state:

“In the past coeliac disease, or intolerance to gluten, has been considered a rare disease in infancy, whose most important signs were chronic diarrhea with malabsorption and reduced growth. However, besides this classical form, there are a number of other clinical and subclinical forms which may appear even in the adult life and without any overt intestinal sign.”

The authors defined their objective:

“The aim of the present paper is to describe and evaluate the effects of coeliac disease on female reproduction. Such effects include delayed menarche, amenorrhea, infertility and early menopause.”

In addition, they noted that…

“Epidemiological studies show that besides reduced fertility, affected women are at higher risk of reproductive problems such as pregnancy loss, low birthweight of offspring and reduced duration of breastfeeding…the possible prevention or treatment of the reproductive effects is only the lifelong maintenance of a gluten-free diet.”

Another paper published in the Journal of Reproductive Medicine reports on a case that highlights the link between gluten sensitivity and amenorrhea. The authors’ conclusion:

“Celiac disease should be considered in patients presenting with malnutrition and primary amenorrhea.”

This was followed by a much more extensive study published recently in the same journal. The authors summarize an extensive body of literature on the subject:

“In women, this disease (celiac, gluten sensitivity) may have implications on menstrual and reproductive health. The symptom complex includes delayed menarche, early menopause, secondary amenorrhea, infertility, recurrent miscarriages and intrauterine growth restriction. These women benefit from early diagnosis and treatment. Therefore, celiac disease should be considered and screening tests performed on women presenting with menstrual and reproductive problems and treated accordingly.”

They offer an exhortation to doctors in their conclusion:

“Evidence in the literature suggests that celiac disease should be suspected in females with menstrual abnormalities, infertility and adverse pregnancy outcome. All health care providers should be aware of these diverse manifestations of the disease. Treating the disease has a benefit and may lead to prevention of symptoms and improvement in the quality of life…It is challenging to identify women with silent celiac disease and treat them with a gluten-free diet and nutrient supplements, which may lead to prevention of menstrual and other reproductive dysfunction.”

Another paper published in the journal Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation focuses on the impact of gluten sensitivity on the reproductive cycle, fertility, pregnancy, and menopause. The authors explain that…

“Celiac disease (gluten-sensitive enteropathy) may manifest clinically with an array of nongastrointestinal symptoms among which are: dermatitis herpetiformis; dementia; depression; various neurological symptoms; osteoporosis; osteomalacia; dental enamel defects, and anemia of various types. Important data have accumulated in recent years regarding the association between celiac disease, fertility and pregnancy. Many primary care obstetricians and gynecologists and perinatologists are not aware of these important relationships.”

What does the scientific evidence establish?

“Review of the literature reveals that patients with untreated celiac disease sustain a significantly delayed menarche, earlier menopause, and an increased prevalence of secondary amenorrhea. Patients with untreated celiac disease incur higher miscarriage rates, increased fetal growth restriction, and lower birth weights.”

An interesting paper that dramatically shows the difference between adhering and not adhering to a gluten free diet for female reproductive health was published in the Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology:

“This study shows a broad analysis of gynaecological and obstetrical disturbances in patients with celiac disease in relation to their nutritional status and adherence to a gluten-free diet.”

In their investigation the authors analyzed data on adults and children/adolescents with gluten sensitivity, taking into consideration nutritional status and gluten-free diet adherence, and compared them to adults and adolescents with irritable bowel syndrome (not due to gluten) as a control group. What did the data show?

“…adult celiac patients, irrespective of the nutritional status…presented delayed menarche, secondary amenorrhea, a higher percentage of spontaneous abortions, anemia and hypoalbuminemia…After treatment, patients presented with normal pregnancies and one patient presented spontaneous abortion. The adolescents who were not adherent to gluten-free diet presented delayed menarche and secondary amenorrhea.”

They state what should by now be obvious in their conclusion:

“Therefore, celiac disease should be included in the screening of reproductive disorders.”

Important: gluten sensitivity without celiac manifestations (1) must be treated the same way as celiac disease and (2) cannot be diagnosed by the usual celiac tests for tissue transglutaminase antibodies, etc. Antibody levels, including anti-gliadin (gluten) antibodies, can fluctuate for a number of reasons resulting in false negatives. The gluten gene sensitivity test can be relied on for a dependable result. This post could go on at great length but the message is clear: for female reproductive disorders gluten sensitivity must be considered as a possible contributing cause.

Men: you are not immune. I am finding gluten sensitivity to be a common cause of low testosterone levels (hypogonadia).

-

This becomes an important question when someone realizes how much they benefit from avoiding gluten due to celiac disease or non-celiac gluten sensitivity. The evidence suggests that corn (maize) has to be considered on an individual basis. It is possible, but not certain, that you may react to corn when you are sensitive to wheat gluten.

Consider this study that was published in the journal GUT, An International Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology. The authors investigated how nitric oxide is part of the intestinal inflammatory reaction reaction to gluten, and how it relates to the white blood cell response. They noted this in their conclusion:

“Mucosal activation of neutrophils and eosinophils [white blood cells] precedes pronounced enhancement of mucosal NO [nitric oxide] production after rectal wheat gluten challenge in patients with coeliac disease. Some of our coeliac patients displayed signs of an inflammatory reaction, as measured by NO and granulocyte markers, after rectal corn gluten challenge.”

So it depends on the individual. The more serious your condition the more important it is to check yourself for corn sensitivity with the immunological ‘gold standard’—a properly managed elimination-provocation protocol.

We are also bereft of a perfectly decisive indication  for oats because rare individuals can react, though this study published in the Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology indicates that most celiac patients can tolerate them. First the authors note that…

“We have…identified three adult coeliac disease patients who developed a flare of active coeliac disease after ingestion of oats, which suggests that oats might not be entirely innocent in coeliac disease.”

They set out to compare the immune response to oats and wheat by comparing production of the main intestinal antibody (IgA) that participates in the reaction. Although other immune activity was observed,…

“No significant differences were found in IgA against oats in oats-eating and non-oats-eating coeliac disease patients.”

Their conclusion:

“Ingestion of oats does not cause increased levels of IgA against oats in adult coeliac disease patients on a gluten-free diet. The findings support the notion that most adult coeliac disease patients can tolerate oats.”

Note the “most”. And even if you are not sensitive to oats, it is important to be sure that they are certified gluten-free. Otherwise they can be contaminated with gluten during storage, transport, processing and packaging.

What about blood tests for food allergies? Too many variables influence antibody tests for them to give a reliable indication. If you have a serious condition with an autoimmune basis, it’s best to consult with a functional medicine practitioner who can  help you through an elimination-provocation protocol (eliminating and re-introducing foods), and who knows how to use objective lab tests to profile your immune imbalance.

-

This important paper was published in the American Journal of Psychiatry. The authors state, “Thyrotoxicosis, celiac disease, acquired hemolytic anemia, interstitial cystitis, and Sjögren’s syndrome had higher prevalence rates among patients with schizophrenia,” and further conclude, “Schizophrenia is associated with a larger range of autoimmune diseases than heretofore suspected. Future research on comorbidity has the potential to advance understanding of pathogenesis of both psychiatric and autoimmune disorders.” In my experience, the autoimmune component must be recognized and treated. A couple related studies:

1. Vitamin D deficiency and schizophrenia published in Schizophrenia Bulletin in April, 2009
2. Gluten sensitivity and schizophrenia also in Schizophrenia Bulletin in June, 2009

-