Suppressing fever for flu and colds is counterproductive

“Data suggest that the use of paracetamol to reduce the body temperature and alleviate the symptoms of flu is counterproductive.” Most readers of this post are probably aware of the importance of fever for mobilizing the immune response to an infection. This letter just published in the British Medical Journal reports on another aspect. As the author states, “Infectious organisms are adapted to the temperature of the part of the body they colonise. Rhinoviruses, which infect the cooler upper airway and sinuses, grow best at 33-35ºC, so inhaling air at about 45ºC for 20 minutes significantly improves the symptoms of a common cold. Conversely, treating the common cold with aspirin causes a significant increase in the rate of production of the virus,” and continues to note the “good reasons to treat flu by encouraging the temperature to rise to 40ºC for at least 24 hours.” Instead of suppressing the immune response, we select from a number of agents to support immune system efficiency and drainage (elimination of the byproducts of infection to increase comfort and reduce adverse sequelae.) BMJ

Fever suppression reduces antibody response to vaccination

Please do not interpret this post as a blanket endorsement of vaccination; this is a complex topic that demands a sophisticated understanding of immune system regulation and the knowledge and clinical experience to apply it on an individual basis. However, this study just published in The Lancet is of interest because it confirms that antipyretic (fever suppressing) medications must be used judiciously (after vaccination or otherwise), because they suppress the body’s disease fighting immune response. “Although febrile reactions significantly decreased, prophylactic administration of antipyretic drugs at the time of vaccination should not be routinely recommended since antibody responses to several vaccine antigens were reduced.”