GGT is an important predictor of diabetes and cardiovascular risk

I always include GGT (Serum γ-Glutamyltransferase) in our basic screening blood panel, but find often that this is not included in lab work that patients bring from elsewhere. A study recently published in the journal Obesity shows that, besides being associated with fatty liver,  GGT is an important metric for predicting metabolic syndrome, diabetes and hypertension. The authors state:

“Serum γ-glutamyltransferase (GGT) is associated with oxidative stress and hepatic steatosis. The extent to which its value in determining incident cardiometabolic risk (coronary heart disease (CHD), metabolic syndrome (MetS), hypertension and type 2 diabetes) is independent of obesity needs to be further explored in ethnicities.”

They examined a cohort of 1,667 adults from a general population age 52 to 63 with 4 year’s follow-up, measuring GGT activity in association with metabolic syndrome (identified by Adult Treatment Panel-III criteria modified for male abdominal obesity) and multiple markers for cardiovascular disease. Their data bolsters the use of GGT for case management:

“Median GGT activity was 24.9 U/l in men, 17.0 U/l in women…while smoking status was not associated, (male) sex, sex-dependent age, alcohol usage, BMI, fasting triglycerides and C-reactive protein (CRP) were significant independent determinants of circulating GGT. Each 1-s.d. increment in (= 0.53 ln GGT) GGT activity significantly predicted in each sex incident hypertension (hazard ratio (HR) 1.20), and similarly MetS, after adjustment for age, alcohol usage, smoking status, BMI and menopause. Strongest independent association existed with diabetes (HR 1.3) whereas GGT activity tended to marginally predict CHD independent of total bilirubin but not of BMI.”

Interestingly…

“Higher serum total bilirubin levels were protective against CHD risk in women.”

While not any stronger a risk predictor for coronary heart disease (CHD) than body mass index (BMI), GTT is a valuable and underutilized marker to use for the case management of cardiometabolic disorders. The authors conclude:

“We conclude that elevated serum GGT confers, additively to BMI, risk of hypertension, MetS, and type 2 diabetes but only mediates adiposity against CHD risk.”

 

 

The highest amounts of calcium intake increase the risk of fracture

Patients are often surprised to learn that osteoporosis is not a calcium deficiency disorder but rather a failure to maintain the microarchitecture of the bone of which the protein matrix is a critical component. Moreover, earlier posts on magnesium and calcium have document the pro-inflammatory potential of calcium supplementation. Now fascinating research just published in the British Medical Journal offers evidence that calcium above the lowest quintile does not improve the risk of fracture of any type, while the highest levels actually increase the risk of fracture. The authors set out to…

“……investigate associations between long term dietary intake of calcium and risk of fracture of any type, hip fractures, and osteoporosis.”

They note that confusion regarding the issue of calcium requirements has been…

“…reflected by the wide range of daily calcium recommendations for individuals older than 50 years: at present 700 mg in the UK, 800 mg in Scandinavia, 1200 mg in the United States, and 1300 mg in Australia and New Zealand.”

The authors investigated 61,433 women born between 1914 and 1948 for 19 years for correlations between dietary intake of calcium and fractures of any type, hip fractures, and osteoporosis. They took into consideration vitamin D consumption, hormonal status, and other pertinent biological and lifestyle factors including physical activity. Perhaps not surprisingly in light of other evidence that has emerged recently about calcium, their data challenges the conventional wisdom:

“These findings show an association between a low habitual dietary calcium intake (lowest quintile) and an increased risk of fractures and of osteoporosis. Above this base level, we observed only minor differences in risk. The rate of hip fracture was even increased in those with high dietary calcium intakes.

In others, amounts higher than the lowest level of calcium intake adequate to avoid gross insufficiency and compromised bone micoarchitecture there were not only no significant benefits, the highest levels of intake increased fracture risk. The authors comment:

“The present results may reflect a situation when a moderate intake of calcium* combined with adequate intake of other micronutrients is sufficient to meet the structural and functional demands of the skeleton. High levels of intake did not further decrease the rate of fracture, and might even increase the rate of hip fractures…Moreover, use of supplemental calcium has been associated with higher rates of hip fracture both in a cohort study and in randomised controlled trials…Furthermore, high calcium doses slow bone turnover and also reduce the number of active bone remodelling sites. This situation can lead to a delay of bone repair caused by fatigue, and thus increase the risk of fractures independent of bone mineral density.”

*Their data indicate that a total dietary intake of 700 mg of calcium per day is sufficient to prevent fracture and osteoporosis. The authors conclude:

“Incremental increases in calcium intake above the level corresponding to the first quintile of our female population were not associated with a further reduction of osteoporotic fracture rate.”

Considering that chronic inflammation can be a primary factor in causing loss of the protein ‘scaffolding’ of bone responsible for strength, resilience, and the matrix to which minerals attach, these findings invoke recollection of the recent evidence that calcium supplementation can increase the inflammation of  cardiovascular disease. In case you missed it, a recent research paper published in the British Medical Journal follows up on earlier reports of this association. The authors’ intent was…

“To investigate the effects of personal calcium supplement use on cardiovascular risk in the Women’s Health Initiative Calcium/Vitamin D Supplementation Study (WHI CaD Study), using the WHI dataset, and to update the recent meta-analysis of calcium supplements and cardiovascular risk.”

The examined the data from a randomised, placebo controlled trial of calcium alone or with vitamin D in 36,282 postmenopausal women over seven years for myocardial infarction, coronary revascularisation, death from coronary heart disease, and stroke. The data told an interesting story:

“In the WHI CaD Study there was an interaction between personal use of calcium supplements and allocated calcium and vitamin D for cardiovascular events…Calcium or calcium and vitamin D increased the risk of myocardial infarction (relative risk 1.24 (1.07 to 1.45), P=0.004) and the composite of myocardial infarction or stroke (1.15 (1.03 to 1.27), P=0.009).”

Clinicians and patients need to appreciate that inflammation, a fundamental causal factor in both osteoporosis and cardiovascular disease, can be made worse by calcium supplements. The authors conclude:

Calcium supplements with or without vitamin D modestly increase the risk of cardiovascular events, especially myocardial infarction, a finding obscured in the WHI CaD Study by the widespread use of personal calcium supplements. A reassessment of the role of calcium supplements in osteoporosis management is warranted.

 

Low testosterone increases heart disease mortality in men

More evidence of the importance of testosterone in preventing heart disease for men is offered in a study just published in the journal Heart in which the authors set out to…

“…examine the effect of serum testosterone levels on survival in a consecutive series of men with confirmed coronary disease and calculate the prevalence of testosterone deficiency.”

They followed 930 men with coronary disease for an average of seven years and correlating all-cause mortality and vascular mortality with testosterone deficiency. What did the data show?

“The overall prevalence of biochemical testosterone deficiency in the coronary disease cohort using bio-available testosterone (bio-T) was 20.9%, using total testosterone was 16.9% and using either was 24%. Excess mortality was noted in the androgen-deficient group compared with normal (41 (21%) vs 88 (12%). The only parameters found to influence time to all-cause and vascular mortality in multivariate analyses were the presence of left ventricular dysfunction, aspirin therapy, β-blocker therapy and low serum bio-T.”

Notice that the bio-available testosterone (free fraction or unbound testosterone, the small percentage that is actually ‘working’) was more revealing than the total testosterone. This is most conveniently measured in a saliva specimen. Clinicians and patients should bear in mind the authors’ conclusion:

In patients with coronary disease testosterone deficiency is common and impacts significantly negatively on survival.

Important: testosterone replacement by gel, cream or patch (transdermal) can easily accumulate to abnormally high (supraphysiologic) levels which ‘back-fires’ by causing testosterone receptor desensitization and pituitary suppression. This may be missed if the correct testosterone test (the bio-active, free fraction portion) is not done.

Nervous system regulation of inflammation, cytokines, and heart rate variability

As readers here know, inflammation is a fundamental factor in chronic disease and accelerated aging (neurodegeneration). A functional approach to treatment requires an objective understanding of how this system is working for each patient. Here are several of the many studies that illustrate how nervous system function and inflammation can be evaluated with heart rate variability (HRV) analysis and cytokine (‘messenger molecules’ of inflammation) levels.

ShockThe practical focus is on restoring parasympathetic nervous system (PNS) activity which inhibits inflammation. (PNS resources decline with disease, stress and age resulting in a state of ‘sympathetic nervous system dominance’.) This paper just published in the journal  Shock shows how autonomic nervous system activity (sympathetic and parasympathetic) as measured by HRV corresponds to inflammatory cytokine activity, in this case when stimulated by endotoxins (poisons produced by bacterial infections):

Autonomic inputs from the sympathetic and parasympathetic nervous systems, as measured by heart rate variability (HRV), have been reported to correlate to the… responses to infectious challenge… In addition, parasympathetic/vagal activity has been shown experimentally to exert anti-inflammatory effects via attenuation of splanchnic tissue TNF-α [cytokine] production. We sought… to determine if baseline HRV parameters correlated with endotoxin-mediated circulating cytokine responses.”

They documented a strong correspondence regardless of gender, body mass index and resting heart rate:

“…we found a significant correlation of several baseline HRV parameters…on TNF-α release after endotoxin exposure.”

Psychosomatic MedicineThis is not a new observation. An interesting study published a few years ago in the journal Psychosomatic Medicine documents the HRV expression of autonomic activity in response to an inflammatory challenge and its correspondence to cytokine production. They begin by noting that:

“…the autonomic nervous system plays a key role in regulating the magnitude of immune responses to inflammatory stimuli. Signaling by the parasympathetic system inhibits the production of proinflammatory cytokines by activated monocytes/macrophages and thus decreases local and systemic inflammation.”

They examined the relationship of HRV to lipopolysaccharide-induced production of the inflammatory cytokines interleukin (IL)-1ß, IL-6, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-{alpha}, and IL-10. What did the data show?

“Consistent with animal findings, higher derived estimates of vagal activity measured during paced respiration* were associated with lower production of the proinflammatory cytokines TNF-{alpha} and IL-6…These associations persisted after controlling for demographic and health characteristics, including age, gender, race, years of education, smoking, hypertension, and white blood cell count.”

Their conclusion has profound implications for the biological mechanism by which stress causes inflammation:

“These data provide initial human evidence that vagal activity is inversely related to inflammatory competence, raising the possibility that vagal regulation of immune reactivity may represent a pathway linking psychosocial factors to risk for inflammatory disease.”

Brain, Behavior, and ImmunityHow might this show up in heart disease? This paper published not long ago in the journal Brain, Behavior, and Immunity investigates the links between HRV, inflammatory cytokines, coronary heart disease and depression:

“Studies show negative correlations between heart rate variability (HRV) and inflammatory markers [less variability = more inflammation]…We investigated links between short-term HRV and inflammatory markers in relation to depression in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients.”

They measured C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6, a cytokine), depression symptoms and heart rate variability determinants of autonomic function. What did their data show?

“…all HRV measures were negatively and significantly associated with both inflammatory markers…HRV independently accounted for at least 4% of the variance in CRP in the depressed, more than any factor except BMI.”

Interestingly, they also noted that:

“Relationships between measures of inflammation and autonomic function are stronger among depressed than non-depressed cardiac patients. Interventions targeting regulation of both autonomic control and inflammation may be of particular importance.”

Journal of Critical CareThe research of another group published in the Journal of Critical Care used sepsis as their model.

“The aim of the study was to investigate possible associations between different heart rate variability (HRV) indices and various biomarkers of inflammation in 45 septic patients.”

They examined the correlation between HRV, C-reactive protein, and the cytokines  interleukin 6 and interleukin 10:

“Our data suggest that low HRV and sympathovagal balance during septic shock are associated with both an increased hyperinflammatory and antiinflammatory response.”

The antiinflammatory response corresponds to high HRV and interleukin-10, the cytokine that is also increased by vitamin D.

Journal of Internal MedicineHow can we reduce inflammation by increasing HRV and reducing inflammatory cytokines? There are numerous methods; one is to increase cholinergic activity in the nervous system (parasympathetic activity mediated by the neurotransmitter acetylcholine). We can increase this with natural precursor support for acetylcholine. This study published recently in the Journal of Internal Medicine shows the connection between vagal parasympathetic function (as shown by HRV), inflammatory cytokines, cholinergic activity and rheumatoid arthritis:

The central nervous system regulates innate immunity in part via the cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway, a neural circuit that transmits signals in the vagus nerve that suppress pro-inflammatory cytokine productionVagus nerve activity is significantly suppressed in patients with autoimmune diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis (RA). It has been suggested that stimulating the cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway may be beneficial to patients…”

They found that increasing cholinergic signaling in stimulated whole blood cultures suppressed cytokine production in rheumatoid arthritis patients whose vagal activity was deficient:

“These findings suggest that it is possible to pharmacologically target the α7nAChR dependent control of cytokine release in RA patients with suppressed vagus nerve activity.”

In a functional medicine practice, of course, we use natural acetylcholine precursors.

Brain, Behavior, and Immunity 2This is a drop in the bucket, but here’s one more fascinating paper published recently in the journal Brain, Behavior, and Immunity that shows how acetylcholine activity in the brain (the upper level of autonomic regulation) controls systemic cytokine levels through vagal function:

The excessive release of cytokines by the immune system contributes importantly to the pathogenesis of inflammatory diseases. Recent advances in understanding the biology of cytokine toxicity led to the discovery of the “cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway,” defined as neural signals transmitted via the vagus nerve that inhibit cytokine releaseVagus nerve regulation of peripheral functions is controlled by brain nuclei and neural networks…Here we report that brain acetylcholinesterase activity controls systemic and organ specific TNF [cytokine] production during endotoxemia.”

They demonstrated that inhibiting the breakdown of acetylcholine† markedly reduced proinflammatory serum TNF levels through the resulting increasing vagus nerve signaling which prevented inflammatory damage. What do they conclude from their research?

“These findings show that inhibition of brain acetylcholinesterase [that breaks down acetylcholine] suppresses systemic inflammation through a central…mediated and vagal…dependent mechanism. Our data also indicate that a clinically used centrally-acting acetylcholinesterase inhibitor† can be utilized to suppress abnormal inflammation to therapeutic advantage.”

* There are numerous therapies to reduce inflammation by increasing parasympathetic function. Breathing is a powerful stimulus to the autonomic nervous system. We train breathing with biofeedback while simultaneously monitoring for CO2 (capnography) and coherence in HRV to hit the physiological “sweet spot”.

† Agents that inhibit the breakdown of neurotransmitters including reuptake inhibitors do not restore the body’s ability to make its own. Precursor therapy provides the natural ingredients that have been depleted or are insufficient to meet genetic needs so neurotransmitters can be increased naturally.

More reasons to go nuts for heart disease

Archives of Internal MedicineA paper just published in the Archives of Internal Medicine analyzes the evidence from 25 intervention trials on the effect of eating nuts on blood lipid levels and heart disease. The authors begin by noting:

Epidemiological studies have consistently associated nut consumption with reduced risk for coronary heart disease…The objectives of this study were to estimate the effects of nut consumption on blood lipid levels and to examine whether different factors modify the effects.”

They pooled the data from 25 trials in 7 countries for cholesterol, LDL, ratio of LDL to HDL, and triglycerides. Improvements were documented in all of these factors. The data also showed that:

“The effects of nut consumption were dose related, and different types of nuts had similar effects on blood lipid levels…the lipid-lowering effects of nut consumption were greatest among subjects with high baseline LDL-C and with low body mass index and among those consuming Western diets.”

In other words, eating more nuts improved the lipid-lowering effect. Hence their conclusion:

Nut consumption improves blood lipid levels in a dose-related manner, particularly among subjects with higher LDL-C or with lower BMI.”

Men, alcohol may help prevent coronary heart disease

Don’t let this research go to your head, but an interesting study was just published in Heart, the journal of the British Cardiovascular Society. The investigators followed 15,630 men and 25,808 women for 10 years and found that moderate, high and very high alcohol consumption (1 to 6 standard drinks per day) was associated with 30% less CHD (coronary heart disease). The authors conclude: “In men aged 29-69 years, alcohol intake was associated with a more than 30% lower CHD incidence.” Sorry ladies, the data did not show a similar benefit for you. Gentlemen, before rushing to the liquor cabinet bear in mind that there are also important reasons for individuals to limit or abstain from alcohol (such as high insulin levels, etc). This is what the data in this study shows, but discuss it with your functional medicine doc.