Posts Tagged ‘colorectal cancer’

Another reminder about insulin and cancer

Tuesday, June 15th, 2010

Postgraduate MedicineA paper published in the most recent issue of Postgraduate Medicine brings to mind the importance of insulin regulation in cancer prevention and treatment. The authors studied the interplay between the use of insulin therapy in diabetes and cancer.

“According to 2007 estimates, 27% of all patients with diabetes use some form of insulin therapy. The increasing utilization of insulin has become a cause for concern because findings from several observational trials have suggested an association with an increased risk of developing cancer.”

The authors undertook a review of scientific studies that assessed the carcinogenic or mitogenic effects of insulin therapy [mitogenic = stimulating mitosis, thus increasing the rate of existing tumor growth]. Here’s how the evidence weighed in:

“Data from our review suggest that insulin analogs…may play more of a mitogenic than a carcinogenic role in association with different types of cancer, suggesting an amplified rate of existing tumor growth in the presence of insulin analogs. Evidence for insulin-induced mitogenicity appears to be most prevalent in prostate, breast, pancreatic, and colorectal cancers.”

I don’t think I can emphasize enough the importance of healthy insulin regulation in cancer prevention and treatment. As the authors state in their conclusion:

“…clinicians must be diligent in both screening for new cancers in patients receiving insulin and in monitoring for tumor growth or maintenance of remission in patients with existing cancers.”

Bookmark and Share

Lower Vitamin D brings higher colorectal cancer risk

Tuesday, February 23rd, 2010

BMJ 011610The large group of researchers who completed this study published recently in the British Journal of Medicine set out “To examine the association between pre-diagnostic circulating vitamin D concentration, dietary intake of vitamin D and calcium, and the risk of colorectal cancer in European populations.” There were no less than 520,000 participating subjects from 10 countries. The results were clear-cut: “25-(OH)D concentration showed a strong inverse linear dose-response association with risk of colorectal cancer.” [25-(OH)D is the active form of vitamin D that we measure with blood tests.] Interestingly, however, they also found that “Dietary vitamin D was not associated with disease risk.” What does this mean? It highlights a very important point: it is not possible to judge whether you have enough vitamin D in your system by what you consume. There are marked differences in genetic and conditional need, and the only way to reliably know that you are adequate or optimal for vitamin D is by the blood test. The authors concluded: “The results of this large observational study indicate a strong inverse association between levels of pre-diagnostic 25-(OH)D concentration and risk of colorectal cancer in western European populations.” The ‘take home’ message is that colon cancer is another in the long list of conditions for which vitamin D is important prevention—but you have to test to know where you stand.

Bookmark and Share

Insulin resistance and colorectal cancer

Wednesday, December 9th, 2009

Two papers have been recently published documenting the link between insulin resistance and colorectal cancer. Insulin was higher and adiponectin (see forthcoming posts) lower with colorectal cancer, and both correlated with the stage of the disease according to the study published in the journal Colorectal Disease. The authors of the second paper published in the World Journal of Gastroenterology state: “In addition to cardiovascular disease, individual components of the metabolic syndrome have been linked to the development of cancer, particularly to colorectal cancer…The physiopathological mechanism that links metabolic syndrome and colorectal cancer is mostly related to abdominal obesity and insulin resistance.” There has been a lot written about screening for colorectal cancer; I’m sure you can appreciate the implications of these papers for prevention.

Bookmark and Share