SSRI antidepressant use during pregnancy may increase the risk of autism

Summary: The use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs, such as Prozac®, Celexa®, Lexapro®, Luvox® and Paxil®) taken during pregnancy—especially the first trimester—appears to increase the risk of autism spectrum disorders. There are evidence-based alternatives to SSRIs that support brain health without putting the fetus at risk.

A study recently published in the journal Archives of General Psychiatry draws attention to a risk of autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) born to mothers who took SSRI antidepressants during their pregnancy. The authors observe:

“The prevalence of autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) has increased over recent years. Use of antidepressant medications during pregnancy also shows a secular increase in recent decades, prompting concerns that prenatal exposure may contribute to increased risk of ASD.”

Therefore they set out to…

“…systematically evaluate whether prenatal exposure to antidepressant medications is associated with increased risk of ASD.”

In order to do so they compared the data for 298 children with ASD to 1507 randomly selected control children, along with the data for both their mothers. Their findings support a cautionary approach to the prenatal use of SSRIs:

“Prenatal exposure to antidepressant medications was reported for 20 case children (6.7%) and 50 control children (3.3%). In adjusted logistic regression models, we found a 2-fold increased risk of ASD associated with treatment with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors by the mother during the year before delivery (adjusted odds ratio, 2.2), with the strongest effect associated with treatment during the first trimester (adjusted odds ratio, 3.8).”

In other words, the increase in risk for the whole year before delivery was 220%, but limiting the investigation to the first trimester it was 380%. Interestingly…

“No increase in risk was found for mothers with a history of mental health treatment in the absence of prenatal exposure to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors.”

Meaning that it wasn’t a history of mental health treatment the year before delivery but specifically the use of SSRIs that accounted for the increased risk of ASDs. The authors conclude:

“Although the number of children exposed prenatally to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in this population was low, results suggest that exposure, especially during the first trimester, may modestly increase the risk of ASD. The potential risk associated with exposure must be balanced with the risk to the mother or fetus of untreated mental health disorders.”

This would be a troubling dilemma were it not for the fact that therapies supporting brain health are available to treat depression. Serotonin production and signaling, when indicated, can be supported in a physiological and sustainable manner that promotes the brain health of mother and fetus. A categorization and description of key resources that applies to adults as well as children is available in the Parents’ Guide To Brain Health.

Electroencephalography (brain waves), neurofeedback, and childhood disorders of learning, behavior and development

Examination of the brain’s electrical activity (electroencephalography, EEG, ‘brain waves’) in ADHD, autistic spectrum disorder and other problems of pediatric learning, behavior and development has advanced greatly in the past decade, establishing the physiological basis for effective non-pharmacological interventions. In a review article published in the journal NeuroMolecular Medicine several years back the authors state in regard to ADHD:

Cognitive and functional studies using electrophysiology and brain imaging frequently indicate altered processing in ADHD during performance on cognitive tasks hypothesized to measure a “core” deficit, such as response inhibition. Yet, children with ADHD appear to suffer from a more general deficit, including impairment in attentional alerting, orienting, response preparation, and control. Reward processes are also altered and, further, a strong association emerges with intraindividual variability… Task performance correlates with underactivation of, especially, frontostriatal areas of the brain, but an extended network of brain regions is also implicated. Electroencephalography studies indicate abnormalities in ADHD in relation to slow-wave activity, linked to underarousal.”

They proceed to discuss how these electrophysiological abnormalities are associated with neurotransmitter regulation in ADHD.

A fascinating study published recently in the journal Neuropharmacology investigates the correlation between brain fatty acids and EEG activity:

Abnormal fatty acid status has been implicated in the aetiology of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Delayed maturation in ADHD may result in raised frontal low frequency (theta) electroencephalographic activity (EEG) and a reduction in posterior high frequency (beta, alpha) activity. The current study used sequential linear regression to investigate the association between age, resting-state EEG and levels of long-chain polyunsaturated omega-3 and omega-6 fatty acids in red blood cells in 46 adolescent boys with ADHD symptoms.”

They observed significant correlations between docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) levels and fast frequency activity and eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) levels and frontal theta activity. Alpha activity correlated positively with semantic memory and theta activity correlated inversely with performance on verbal memory. They conclude by summarizing:

“Results support differential associations for DHA and EPA with fast and slow EEG activity respectively. Results support EEG activity as an objective biomarker of neural function associated with long-chain omega-3 fatty acids in ADHD.”

Impaired functional connectivity in the brain networks involved in paying attention is described in a paper published recently in the journal Biological Psychiatry:

“Current pathophysiologic models of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) suggest that impaired functional connectivity within brain attention networks may contribute to the disorder. In this electroencephalographic (EEG) study, we analyzed cross-frequency amplitude correlations to investigate differences in cue-induced functional connectivity in typically developing children and children with ADHD.”

The authors measured EEG activity in 25 children (14 with ADHD) while they performed a cross-modal attention task. They observed distinct deficits in EEG correlates of attentional control in the children with ADHD. Their conclusion:

“Our findings provide neurophysiological evidence for a specific deficit in top-down attentional control in children with ADHD that is manifested as a functional disconnection between frontal and occipital cortex.”

An interesting paper published earlier in Biological Psychiatry demonstrates that children of parents with childhood onset depression exhibit EEG deficits in selective attention:

“Individual differences in selective attention may play a role in moderating psychological vulnerabilities by shaping the ability to self-regulate emotion. Children of parents with childhood-onset depression (COD) are at increased risk for socioemotional difficulties. This study examined potential differences in selective attention as a function of parental COD.”

The authors observed that children of parents with COD were slower in their EEG response rates compared with control children. The at-risk children also showed abnormally larger slow wave amplitudes in anterior scalp sites that correlate with attention. They conclude:

“These data suggest that there are subtle deficits in selective attention among the offspring of individuals with COD, requiring that they engage more processing resources to perform effectively. This may affect their ability to adequately regulate emotion under stress.

Another study in the same issue of Biological Psychiatry provides evidence that functional impairments in ADHD are not due to ‘developmental lag’ but to neural processing deficits that can be observed in the brain’s electrical activity. The authors state:

“We examined the development of neurophysiological markers of attention (Cue P300; contingent negative variation [CNV]) and inhibition (NoGo P300) in ADHD and control groups from childhood to adolescence for support of the developmental lag hypothesis of ADHD.”

The data they compiled led to a dismissal of the developmental lag hypothesis in favor of dysfunctional neural processing:

“These results provide strong evidence for multiple and persistent neural processing deficits in ADHD. They do not support the developmental lag hypothesis for attentional dysfunction in ADHD despite partial evidence that developmental lag contributes to inhibitory brain dysfunction during early adolescence.”

Is there good evidence for using neurofeedback (brain wave biofeedback) as an effective, physiological, non-pharmacologic intervention to promote normal function in disorders of learning, behavior and development? European scientists have made numerous contributions to this field. Consider this paper published six years ago in the German medical journal Zeitschrift für Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie und Psychotherapie (Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy) in which the authors state:

Neurofeedback is aiming at an improvement of ADHD core-symptoms via the voluntary modification of abnormal neurophysiologic parameters, e.g. EEG-frequency spectrum and event-related potentials…Our review presents an overview of the current research on neurofeedback for the treatment of ADHD.”

They examined the outcomes of three studies that pitted neurofeedback against standard pharma stimulant treatment. What did the data show?

Neurofeedback lead to significant improvement of attention, impulsivity and hyperactivity, without adversive side effects. Additionally, there was a  persistent amelioration of EEG parameters, while stimulants did not lead to a comparable normalization…Neurofeedback is a promising approach for the treatment of children with ADHD.”

A more recent review published in Current Psychiatry Reports documents that quantitative electroencephalography (QEEG, computerized mathematical analysis of raw EEG data) offers both diagnostic and therapeutic advantages:

“Although behavioral symptoms of inattention, impulsivity, and hyperactivity serve as a foundation for the accurate diagnosis of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), the low interrater reliability and specificity of behavioral rating scales and the absence of comprehensive screening for medical conditions that mimic ADHD have created a barrier to the effective treatment of ADHD. Recently published studies using quantitative electroencephalographic techniques have identified abnormal patterns of cortical activation through power spectral analysis, in event-related cortical potentials, and in slow cortical potentials that may serve as a basis for overcoming these barriers.”

The authors examine studies that provide evidence for the use of QEEG in differentiating ADHD from other psychiatric disorders, evaluating the response to medications, and its role in neurofeedback therapy.

More confirmation of the efficacy of neurofeedback is offered in a study published earlier this year in the European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry. The authors state:

“In a randomised controlled trial, NF [neurofeedback] training was found to be superior to a computerised attention skills training (AST)… In the present paper, treatment effects at 6-month follow-up were studied.”

They examined 94 children with ADHD, aged 8–12 years, who completed either 36 sessions of NF training or a computerised AST. Pre-training, post-training and follow-up assessment were assessed by several behaviour rating scales…with follow-up information analysed…on a per-protocol basis. What did the data show?

Improvements in the NF group at follow-up were superior to those of the control group and comparable to the effects at the end of the training…In conclusion, behavioural improvements induced by NF training in children with ADHD were maintained at a 6-month follow-up. Though treatment effects appear to be limited, the results confirm the notion that NF is a clinically efficacious module in the treatment of children with ADHD.”

The authors of a study published last year in the Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry also confirmed the efficacy of neurofeedback as a treatment for ADHD in a randomised controlled clinical trial:

“…we evaluated the clinical efficacy of neurofeedback in children with ADHD in a multisite randomised controlled study using a computerised attention skills training as a control condition.”

They examined 102 children with ADHD who performed either 36 sessions of neurofeedback with one block of theta/beta training and one block of slow cortical potential (SCP) training or did a comparable amount computerised attention skills training as a control. Outcomes were evaluated by several behaviour rating scales, with ‘placebo’ scales applied to control for parental expectations. What did the data show?

“…improvements in the NF group were superior to those of the control group…Comparable effects were obtained for the two NF protocols (theta/beta training, SCP training). Parental attitude towards the treatment did not differ between NF and control group.”

The authors conclude by stating:

Superiority of the combined NF training indicates clinical efficacy of NF in children with ADHD.

A meta-analysis published last year in the journal Clinical EEG & Neuroscience is also reassuring:

Since the first reports of neurofeedback treatment in Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) in 1976, many studies have investigated the effects of neurofeedback on different symptoms of ADHD such as inattention, impulsivity and hyperactivity…In this study selected research on neurofeedback treatment for ADHD was collected and a meta-analysis was performed.”

The authors examined both prospective controlled studies and studies employing a pre- and post-design and found large effect sizes (ES) for neurofeedback on impulsivity and inattention and a medium ES for hyperactivity, leading to this conclusion:

“Due to the inclusion of some very recent and sound methodological studies in this meta-analysis…the clinical effects of neurofeedback in the treatment of ADHD can be regarded as clinically meaningful…we conclude that neurofeedback treatment for ADHD can be considered “Efficacious and Specific” (Level 5) with a large ES for inattention and impulsivity and a medium ES for hyperactivity.”

Neurofeedback training (operant conditioning) can be applied according to a wide range of protocols. Additional research is revealing the value and importance of specific protocol selection according to the case. A recent study published in the International Journal of Psychophysiology adds to this body of knowledge:

“In a randomized controlled trial, neurofeedback (NF) training was found to be superior to a computerised attention skills training concerning the reduction of ADHD symptomatology…The aims of this investigation were to assess the impact of different NF protocols (theta/beta training and training of slow cortical potentials, SCPs) on the resting EEG and the association between distinct EEG measures and behavioral improvements.”

EEG changes before and after specific NF trainings (theta/beta and SCP) or a control training were examined in 72 children with ADHD aged 8–12. Activity in the different EEG frequency bands was analyzed. What did the data show?

“In contrast to the control condition, the combined NF training was accompanied by a reduction of theta activity. Protocol-specific EEG changes…were associated with improvements in the German ADHD rating scale. Related EEG-based predictors were obtained.”

Their conclusion has significant practical importance for the neurofeedback practitioner:

“Thus, differential EEG patterns for theta/beta and SCP training provide further evidence that distinct neuronal mechanisms may contribute to similar behavioral improvements in children with ADHD.”

Interesting work with neurofeedback is also being done in China. A study published in the Chinese Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics examines the effect of neurofeedback training on the ratio slow theta (θ) and fast beta (β) brain waves:

“When the [ADHD] children fulfill cognition tasks, brain θ wave activity increases and β wave activity weakens. This study aimed to explore the efficacy of electroencephalographic (EEG) biofeedback therapy for ADHD in children by assessing the changes of the ratio of brain θ to β waves and the integrated visual and auditory continuous performance test (IVA-CPT).”

They performed EEG biofeedback therapy with 30 children with ADHD and measured the ratio of brain θ to β waves before and after therapy. IVA-CPT was used to assess the effectiveness of biofeedback therapy. What did their data show?

“After two courses of treatment, the mean ratio of brain θ to β waves in the 30 children with ADHD was significantly reduced from 12.32±4.35 (before treatment) to 6.54±1.27. IVA-CPT demonstrated that the values of six indexes measured, including integrate reaction control quotient, integrate attention quotient, auditory and visual reaction control quotients, auditory and visual attention control quotients, were significantly increased after biofeedback therapy.”

Their conclusion should be appreciated by parents and clinicians alike:

EEG biofeedback can reduce the ratio of brain θ to β waves and lead to significant decreases in inattention and hyperactivity and it is effective for treatment of ADHD in children.

Neurofeedback is, of course, beneficial for many more conditions than ADHD. A paper published in Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback reviews the evidence for the effectiveness of neurofeedback for Asperger’s syndrome (AS) and autistic spectrum disorder.

“This paper summarizes data from a review of neurofeedback (NFB) training with 150 clients with Asperger’s Syndrome (AS) and 9 clients with Autistic Spectrum Disorder (ASD) seen over a 15 year period (1993–2008) in a clinical setting. The main objective was to investigate whether electroncephalographic (EEG) biofeedback, also called neurofeedback (NFB), made a significant difference in clients diagnosed with AS.”

Clients received 40–60 sessions of NFB, which was combined with training in metacognitive strategies and, for most older adolescent and adult clients, with other supportive biofeedback…Significant improvements were found on measures of attention, core symptoms, achievement, and intelligence along with a decrease in relevant EEG ratios was also observed. The authors conclude:

“The positive outcomes of decreased symptoms of Asperger’s and ADHD (including a decrease in difficulties with attention, anxiety, aprosodias, and social functioning) plus improved academic and intellectual functioning, provide preliminary support for the use of neurofeedback as a helpful component of effective intervention in people with AS.”

Advances in the science of brain electrophysiology and neurofeedback have yielded a richer repertoire of methods to individualize interventions for enhanced outcomes. Brain wave biofeedback addressing slow cortical potentials (SCP, the direct versus alternating currents in the brain generated partly by glial cells that outnumber neurons) has been vigorously investigated particularly by European researchers. A study published in the Journal of Neural Transmission

“…compared changes in quantitative EEG (QEEG) and CNV (contingent negative variation) of children suffering from ADHD treated by SCP (slow cortical potential) neurofeedback (NF) with the effects of group therapy (GT) to separate specific from non-specific neurophysiological effects of NF.”

The authors assigned children with ADHD to either SCP neurofeedback or group therapy and correlated the effects with QEEG measurements and behavioral ratings. Children with ADHD-combined type in the NF group had improvement of selected QEEG markers that were associated with behavioral scales, with specific influences of SCP training on brain functions evident.

“To conclude, SCP neurofeedback improves only selected attentional brain functions as measurable with QEEG at rest or CNV mapping.”

Another study just published by German scientists in the journal Clinical Neurophysiology presents further evidence for neurofeedback from a randomised controlled trial:

“Children with ADHD either completed a NF training or a computerized attention skills training…At three times (pre-training, between the two training blocks and at post-training), event-related potentials (ERP) were recorded during the Attention Network Test.”

They observed an increase of the CNV specific for the slow cortical potential neurofeedback training which was associated with a larger reduction of ADHD symptomatology.

“These distinct ERP effects are closely related to a successful NF training in children with ADHD.

A valuable study published in the journal Pediatrics offers additional evidence for the neurofeedback training of slow cortical potentials for ADHD:

“We investigated the effects of self-regulation of slow cortical potentials for children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Slow cortical potentials are slow event-related direct-current shifts of the electroencephalogram. Slow cortical potential shifts in the electrical negative direction reflect the depolarization of large cortical cell assemblies, reducing their excitation threshold. This training aims at regulation of cortical excitation thresholds considered to be impaired in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Electroencephalographic data from the training and the 6-month follow-up are reported, as are changes in behavior and cognition.”

The authors gave 30 sessions of self-regulation training of slow cortical potentials to 23 children with ADHD by feeding back increasing and decreasing slow cortical potentials at central brain regions through visual and auditory stimuli. Their data painted a gratifying picture:

“Measurement before and after the trials showed that children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder learn to regulate negative slow cortical potentials. After training, significant improvement in behavior, attention, and IQ score was observed…All changes proved to be stable at 6 months’ follow-up after the end of training.”

They added an intriguing hypothesis:

“It is suggested that regulation of frontocentral negative slow cortical potentials affects the cholinergic-dopaminergic balance and allows children to adapt to task requirements more flexibly.”

Another study published in Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback confirms that different approaches to exercising healthier brain self-regulation with neurofeedback can be successful.

“Behavioral and cognitive improvements in children with ADHD have been consistently reported after neurofeedback-treatment…This study addresses previous methodological shortcomings while comparing a neurofeedback-training of Theta-Beta frequencies and training of slow cortical potentials (SCPs). The study aimed at answering (a) whether patients were able to demonstrate learning of cortical self-regulation, (b) if treatment leads to an improvement in cognition and behavior and (c) if the two experimental groups differ in cognitive and behavioral outcome variables.”

Two groups of 19 children with ADHD ages 8-13 were assigned to either SCP or Theta/Beta training for three phases of 10 sessions each. Both groups were blind to their assignment and potentially confounding variables were assessed. What were the results?

“Both groups were able to intentionally regulate cortical activity and improved in attention and IQ. Parents and teachers reported significant behavioral and cognitive improvements. Clinical effects for both groups remained stable six months after treatment. Groups did not differ in behavioural or cognitive outcome.”

Neurofeedback practitioners hail from a variety of professional backgrounds. Good outcomes are more likely if the practitioner has multiple neurofeedback modalities to choose from according to the needs of the individual, access to objective evaluation of brain function by QEEG assessment, and the brain is supported according to its metabolic, hormonal and other needs from a functional medicine perspective.

Gluten sensitivity and childhood disorders of learning, behavior and development

While celiac disease often goes undiagnosed, failure to recognize the non-celiac manifestations of gluten sensitivity is widespread. The neurological effects can contribute to disorders of learning, behavior and neurodevelopment even in the absence of intestinal symptoms. The authors of a study published in the Journal of Attention Disorders observe:

“Several studies report a possible association of celiac disease (CD) with psychiatric and psychological disturbances, such as ADHD.”

They examined 132 subjects affected by CD for ADHD symptoms by behavioral scale before and 6 months after a gluten-free diet was started, and found that:

“The overall score improved significantly as well as most of the ADHD-like symptomatology specific features (Bonferroni-corrected, paired-sample t tests).”

They state in their conclusion:

“The data indicate that ADHD-like symptomatology is markedly overrepresented among untreated CD patients and that a gluten-free diet may improve symptoms significantly within a short period of time. The results of this study also suggest that CD should be included in the list of diseases associated with ADHD-like symptomatology.”

Remember, as the authors of a paper published by GeneReviews state:

Classic celiac disease, characterized by mild to severe gastrointestinal symptoms, is less common than nonclassic celiac disease, characterized by absence of gastrointestinal symptoms.”

The report on a study published in the journal Psychosomatics begins with the observation:

A high prevalence of depressive symptoms, hypothetically related to serotonergic dysfunction, has been reported among adults with celiac disease. The authors used semistructured psychiatric interviews and symptom measurement scales to study mental disorders in 29 adolescents with celiac disease and 29 matched comparison subjects.

The also observe in review of the existing evidence:

“Patients with celiac disease may suffer from neurological symptoms, such as peripheral neuropathy, ataxia, intellectual deterioration, brain atrophy, and epilepsy…In addition to neurological manifestations, a significantly higher prevalence of depressive symptoms (30–69%) and depressive disorders (42%) has been reported in adult celiac disease patients, compared to medical and normal comparison subjects…Improvement in depressive disorders has been described in some celiac disease patients after they started a gluten-free diet.

What did their findings show specifically in regard to adolescents?

“We found that celiac disease was associated with higher lifetime prevalences of major depressive disorder and disruptive behavior disorder in adolescents…at least in some of these patients major depression and disruptive behavior disorder were related to celiac disease and alleviated by treatment of celiac disease with a gluten-free diet.”

The clinical implications of the data are summarized in their conclusion:

“Celiac disease is associated with increased prevalence of depressive and disruptive behavior disorders in adolescents, particularly in the phase before diet treatment. In some cases psychiatric symptoms appear to improve after the patient starts a gluten-free diet. The possibility of undiagnosed celiac disease should be taken into account in the differential diagnosis of these disorders, since the diet treatment is essential.

Interestingly, in light of the reports that follow, they also make this observation:

The risk of psychological disorders is substantially higher in children with a chronic disease and, for unknown reasons, particularly in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

What are the mechanisms by which gluten sensitivity can contribute to neurodevelopmental disorders? A study published in the Journal of Clinical Immunology examines gut mucosal immunopathology in relation to regressive autism:

Inflammatory intestinal pathology has been reported in children with regressive autism (affected children). Detailed analysis of intestinal biopsies in these children indicates a novel lymphocytic enterocolitis with autoimmune features…”

The authors undertook a detailed analysis of mucosal infiltrate with flow cytometry (inspected the cellular components of gut lining secretions) and intestinal biopsies, and…

“…found a prominent mucosal eosinophil [allergen-reactive white blood cell] infiltrate in affected children that was significantly lower in those on a gluten- and casein-free diet… The data provide further evidence of a pan-enteric mucosal immunopathology in children with regressive autism that is apparently distinct from other inflammatory bowel diseases.”

Antibodies to neuronal tissues, signaling molecules and key enzymes can also play a role in neurological disorders associated with gluten sensitivity. The authors of a paper published in the journal Acta Neurologica Scandinavica state:

“The high prevalence of gluten sensitivity in patients with stiff-person syndrome (SPS) lead us to investigate the relationship between gluten sensitivity and GAD-antibody-associated diseases.”

GAD is glutamic acid decarboxylase, aka glutamate decarboxylase. Most clinicians reading this are aware that GAD is a target for autoantibodies in type 1 diabetes, but may not recall that it is required to convert glutamate into GABA, our most abundant inhibitory (calming) neurotransmitter. Functional deficiencies of GABA can manifest as anxiety, restlessness, disorganized attention, inner excitability and tension with difficulty relaxing, feeling overwhelmed, worry, etc. The authors used ELISA assays for anti-GAD and for serological markers of gluten sensitivity in patients recruited from clinics based at the Royal Hallamshire hospital, Sheffield, UK. Those with gluten sensitivity were followed up after the introduction of a gluten-free diet. Their data painted a compelling picture:

“Six of seven (86%) patients with SPS were positive for anti-GAD…This compared with 9/90 (11%) patients with idiopathic sporadic ataxia…16/40 (40%) patients with gluten ataxia…and 6/10 patients with type 1 diabetes only…The titre of anti-GAD reduced following the introduction of a gluten-free diet in patients with SPS who had serological evidence of gluten sensitivity. The same was observed in patients with gluten ataxia and anti-GAD antibodies. This was also associated with clinical improvement.

Parents of patients and the practitioners caring for them should bear their conclusion in mind:

“These findings suggest a link between gluten sensitivity and GAD antibody-associated diseases.”

Interestingly, impairment in the ability to digest gliadin (from gluten), a problem which has a genetic basis, can contribute to affective disorders. The authors of a paper published in Behavioral and Brain Functions offer evidence from an investigation of the urine of depressed patients for relevant undigested peptides:

“We find overlapping patterns of peptide peaks in severe depression, but with considerable individuality. Mass spectrometry shows that some of these peptides are probably of dietary origin, because their sequences are found only in certain dietary proteins. Opioids from casein and gliadin are typical examples.

Their conclusion is part of the rationale for offering specific digestive enzymes (peptidases) to patients with gluten sensitivity:

“Peptide increase in urine is found when break down is deficient, and the data presented agree with reports on peptidase deficiencies in depression.”

Another mechanism by which gluten can promote autoimmune disorders with neurological, behavioral and neurodevelopmental consequences is by causing abnormal permeability (‘leakiness’) of the intestinal mucosal barrier. This causes the gut-associated immune tissue to be abnormally exposed to the intestinal contents. The authors of a paper published recently in the Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences examine the link between intestinal permeability and autoimmune disease:

“Interestingly, recent data suggest that gliadin is also involved in the pathogenesis of T1D. There is growing evidence that increased intestinal permeability plays a pathogenic role in various autoimmune diseases including CD and T1D. Therefore, we hypothesize that besides genetic and environmental factors, loss of intestinal barrier function is necessary to develop autoimmunity.”

In delineating the process by which exposure to antigen in the gut triggers a genetic susceptibility, they note:

“In all cases, increased permeability precedes disease and causes an abnormality in antigen delivery that triggers immune events, eventually leading to a multiorgan process and autoimmunity.”

Moreover…

Alterations in the intestinal balance between beneficial and potentially harmful bacteria have also been associated with allergy, type 1 diabetes and inflammatory bowel diseases…”

These factors come to a point that disrupts the tight junctions (TJ) of the intestinal barrier by perturbing the production of zonulin, an agent involved in loss of barrier function and autoimmune disease:

“The zonulin upregulation during the acute phase of CD was confirmed by measuring zonulin concentration…Compared to healthy controls, CD subjects showed significantly higher zonulin serum concentrations during the acute phase of the disease that decreased following a gluten-free diet…Similar results were obtained from T1D subjects…Our group has generated evidence that gliadin induces increased intestinal permeability by releasing preformed zonulin…When exposed to luminal gliadin, intestinal biopsies from celiac patients in remission expressed a sustained luminal zonulin release and increase in intestinal permeability.”

They summarize their findings with this important statement:

“Genetic predisposition, miscommunication between innate and adaptive immunity, exposure to environmental triggers, and loss of intestinal barrier function secondary to dysfunction of intercellular TJ all seem to be key components in the pathogenesis of autoimmune diseases. Both in CD and T1D gliadin may play a role in causing loss of intestinal barrier function and/or inducing the autoimmune response in genetically predisposed individuals…Since TJ dysfunction allows this interaction, new therapeutic strategies aimed at re-establishing the intestinal barrier function offer innovative, unexplored approaches for the treatment of these devastating diseases.”

Further confirmation of the damage gliadin does to the intestinal epithelial barrier is offered in a paper published in the Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology:

“We investigated whether gliadin has any immediate effect on zonulin release and signaling.”

They exposed human intestinal tissue to gliadin and evaluated zonulin release and barrier permeability by PCR (polymerase chain reaction) and immunofluorescence microscopy. They too documented similar effects:

“When exposed to luminal gliadin, intestinal biopsies from celiac patients in remission expressed a sustained luminal zonulin release and increase in intestinal permeability…”

However, they found that non-celiac patients also exhibited an increased zonulin release that, while not the magnitude of the celiac patients, caused intestinal permeability:

“…biopsies from non-celiac patients demonstrated a limited, transient zonulin release which was paralleled by an increase in intestinal permeability…”

This would be an argument in favor of everyone adopting a gluten-free diet. The authors’ conclusion is striking:

“Based on our results, we concluded that gliadin activates zonulin signaling irrespective of the genetic expression of autoimmunity, leading to increased intestinal permeability to macromolecules.”

The authors of a study published in the journal Gastroenterology add to the body of knowledge by identifying the mechanism by which gluten increases zonulin release and intestinal permeability:

“Celiac disease is an immune-mediated enteropathy triggered by gliadin, a component of the grain protein gluten. Gliadin induces an MyD88-dependent zonulin release that leads to increased intestinal permeability…We aimed to establish the molecular basis of gliadin interaction with intestinal mucosa leading to intestinal barrier impairment.

They demonstrated that the chemokine receptor CXCR3 binds gliadin by examining CXCR3 protein and gene expression in intestinal epithelial cell lines and biopsy specimens, and gliadin-CXCR3 interaction by immunofluorescence microscopy, laser capture microscopy, real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction, and immunoprecipitation/Western blot analysis. On a positive note, the observed that…

Gliadin binds to CXCR3 and leads to MyD88-dependent zonulin release and increased intestinal permeability…[however] Mucosal CXCR3 expression was elevated in active celiac disease but returned to baseline levels following implementation of a gluten-free diet.

What about evidence that following a gluten-free diet helps with behavioral disorders of children and adolescents? The authors of a study published in BMC (BioMed Central) Psychiatry state:

Coeliac disease in adolescents has been associated with an increased prevalence of depressive and disruptive behavioural disorders, particularly in the phase before diet treatment. We studied the possible effects of a gluten-free diet on psychiatric symptoms, on hormonal status (prolactin, thyroidal function) and on large neutral amino acid serum concentrations in adolescents with coeliac disease commencing a gluten-free diet.”

Moreover…

“Coeliac disease is an under-diagnosed autoimmune type of gastrointestinal disorder… Non-specific symptoms such as fatigue and dyspepsia are common, but the disease may also be clinically silent….Undetected or neglected, coeliac disease is associated with serious complications…depressive and disruptive behavioural disorders are highly common also among adolescents, particularly in the phase before diet treatment…Recently 73% of patients with untreated coeliac disease – but only 7% of patients adhering to a gluten-free diet – were reported to have cerebral blood flow abnormalities similar to those among patients with depressive disorders.

They assessed adolescents aged 12 to 16 years with several symptom scales and followed them at intervals after starting a gluten-free diet. What did their data show?

Adolescent coeliac disease patients with depression had significantly lower pre-diet tryptophan/ competing amino-acid (CAA) ratios and free tryptophan concentrations, and significantly higher biopsy morning prolactin levels compared to those without depression. A significant decrease in psychiatric symptoms was found at 3 months on a gluten-free diet compared to patients’ baseline condition, coinciding with significantly decreased coeliac disease activity and prolactin levels and with a significant increase in serum concentrations of CAAs.”

Parents and clinicians should consider their conclusions:

“…since diet treatment may alleviate psychiatric symptoms, and earlier diagnosis may have beneficial effects on psychological and even on neurobiological vulnerability to depression, the possibility of psychiatric complications of coeliac disease needs to be taken into account in differential diagnosis of depressive and behavioural disorders.”

A paper published in the journal Nutritional Neuroscience suggests similar indications for some children with autism spectrum disorders:

“There is increasing interest in the use of gluten- and casein-free diets for children with autism spectrum disorders (ASDs). We report results from a two-stage, 24-month, randomised, controlled trial incorporating an adaptive ‘catch-up’ design and interim analysis.”

They randomly assigned 72 Danish children to two diets and examined them for inattention and hyperactivity at baseline, 8 and 12 months. At that point there data showed that…

“…there was a significant improvement to mean diet group scores (time*treatment interaction) on sub-domains of ADOS, GARS and ADHD-IV measures. Surpassing of predefined statistical thresholds as evidence of improvement in group A at 12 months sanctioned the re-assignment of group B participants to active dietary treatment.”

The authors state in their conclusion:

“Our results suggest that dietary intervention may positively affect developmental outcome for some children diagnosed with ASD.”

What is the practical bottom line for parents and practitioners? There is mounting scientific evidence that the possibility of gluten sensitivity should not be overlooked when investigating the contributing causes to childhood disorders of learning, behavior and neurodevelopment. Given that celiac disease can be ‘silent’, and that we are particularly concerned with the non-celiac neurological manifestations of gluten sensitivity, testing for the genetic susceptibility in addition to anti-gliadin antibodies is a clinically prudent course of action.

The role of autoimmunity and brain inflammation in disorders of learning, behavior and autism

There is a large and growing body of evidence for the role of brain inflammation due to immune dysregulation in disorders of learning, behavior and autism. A study recently published in the journal Biological Psychiatry shows how the microglia (immune cells in the brain) are activated and increased in the prefrontal cortex in autism:

In the neurodevelopmental disorder autism, several neuroimmune abnormalities have been reported. However, it is unknown whether microglial somal volume or density are altered in the cortex and whether any alteration is associated with age or other potential covariates.”

The authors used advanced immunochemistry and nuclear imaging techniques to compare microglial activation and volume in autistic and normal brains. Their conclusion:

“Given its early presence, microglial activation may play a central role in the pathogenesis of autism in a substantial proportion of patients.”

Autoimmune activity may manifest through a variety of autoantibodies to neural tissues in autistic spectrum disorders, epilepsy, Landau-Kleffner Syndrome (infantile acquired aphasia), etc. An earlier paper in Biological Psychiatry documents abnormal immune markers in the serum in association with these disorders:

Brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) elevation in newborn sera predicts intellectual/social developmental abnormalities. Other autoantibodies (AAs) to endothelial cells (ECs) and myelin basic protein (MBP) are also elevated in some children. We tested relationships between BDNF, BDNF AAs, and other AAs in children with these disorders.

The authors measured these immune ‘attack molecules’ in measured in children with autism, childhood disintegrative disorder (CDD), pervasive developmental delay-not otherwise specified (PDD-nos), acquired epilepsy, Landau-Kleffner syndrome (LKS); healthy children (HC), and children with non-neurological illnesses (NNI). The data showed significant elevations. Their conclusion:

Children with developmental disorders and epilepsy have higher AAs to several neural antigens compared to controls. The presence of both BDNF AAs and elevated BDNF levels in some children with autism and CDD suggests a previously unrecognized interaction between the immune system and BDNF.”

Immune dysregulation can manifest on a spectrum of developmental dysfunction from very mild development and learning disorders to full-blown autism. A recent paper in the same journal presents the evidence for immune dysfunction in healthy siblings of autistic kids:

“Endophenotypes are simple biological aspects of a disease that can be observed in unaffected relatives…an “autism endophenotype” justifies the observation that a mild reduction in ideational fluency and nonverbal generativity might be observed in healthy, unaffected relatives of children with autism…we examined whether the “autism endophenotype” would extend its effects on the immune system.

The authors tested multiple immune parameters in autistic kids and their siblings in comparison to healthy ‘controls’ without a family history for autism and came to this conclusion:

“Results of this pilot study indicate that a complex immune dysfunction is present both in autistic children and in their non-autistic siblings and show the presence of an “autism endophenotype” that expands its effects on immunologic functions.”

An early paper published in Pediatric Neurology provides evidence of neuroinflammation in the cerebrospinal fluid in autism:

“In order to find evidence for neuroinflammation, we compared levels of sensitive indicators of immune activation: quinolinic acid, neopterin, and biopterin, as well as multiple cytokines and cytokine receptors, in cerebrospinal fluid and serum from children with autism, to control subjects with other neurologic disorders.”

Neopterin and biopterin are easily measured in the urine. What did the data show?

“In cerebrospinal fluid from 12 children with autism, quinolinic acid and neopterin were decreased, and biopterin was elevated, compared with control subjects.”

Subsequent research published in the same journal revealed the role of the pro-inflammatory cytokine tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) in cases of autism that became worse:

“Recent reports implicating elevated cytokines in the central nervous system in a small number of patients studied with autism have reported clinical regression.”

The authors’ measurements of TNF-α in the serum and CSF of autistic children resulted in data that painted this picture:

“Elevation of cerebrospinal fluid levels of tumor necrosis factor-alpha was significantly higher than concurrent serum levels in all of the patients studied. The ratio of the cerebrospinal fluid levels to serum levels averaged 53.7:1…This observation may offer a unique insight into central nervous system inflammatory mechanisms that may contribute to the onset of autism and may serve as a potential clinical marker.”

Research just published in the journal Brain, Behavior, and Immunity reports the role of other pro-inflammatory cytokines in worsening cases of autistic spectrum disorder.

“A potential role for immune dysfunction has been suggested in Autism spectrum disorders (ASD). To test this hypothesis, we investigated evidence of differential cytokine release in plasma samples obtained from 2 to 5 year-old children with ASD compared with age-matched typically developing (TD) children and children with developmental disabilities other than autism.”

The data painted an unmistakable and compelling picture:

“Observations indicate significant increases in plasma levels of a number of cytokines, including IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8 and IL-12p40 in the ASD group compared with TD controls. Moreover, when the ASD group was separated based on the onset of symptoms, it was noted that the increased cytokine levels were predominantly in ASD children who had a regressive form of ASD. In addition, increasing cytokine levels were associated with more impaired communication and aberrant behaviors.

Their conclusion is important for every clinician and parent to bear in mind:

“In conclusion, using larger number of participants than previous studies, we report significantly shifted cytokine profiles in ASD. These findings suggest that ongoing inflammatory responses may be linked to disturbances in behavior and require confirmation in larger replication studies. The characterization of immunological parameters in ASD has important implications for diagnosis, and should be considered when designing therapeutic strategies to treat core symptoms and behavioral impairments of ASD.”

We can also be informed by a fascinating study published in Biological Psychiatry confirming that behavioral abnormalities are associated with autoimmune attack on hormones in the brain and periphery. The authors set out to resolve the biological mechanism involved in aggressive behavior:

“Altered stress response is characteristic for subjects with abnormal aggressive and antisocial behavior…We hypothesized that autoantibodies (autoAbs) directed against several stress-related neurohormones may exist in aggressive subjects.”

Assays for antibodies revealed a definite pattern for both conduct disorder and prisoners groups leading the authors to conclude:

High levels of ACTH-reactive autoAbs as well as altered levels of oxytocin- and vasopressin-reactive autoAbs found in aggressive subjects may interfere with the neuroendocrine mechanisms of stress and motivated behavior. Our data suggest a new biological mechanism of human aggressive behavior that involves autoAbs directed against several stress-related neurohormones.”

We can also appreciate the evidence presented the Journal of Neuroimmunology that autism is characterized by a deficit in the ability to dampen autoimmune attack on the brain by the cytokine transforming growth factor beta-1 (TGFβ1):

Autism spectrum disorders (ASD) are characterized by impairment in social interactions, communication deficits, and restricted repetitive interests and behaviors. There is evidence of both immune dysregulation and autoimmune phenomena in autism. We examined the regulatory cytokine transforming growth factor beta-1 (TGFβ1) because of its role in controlling immune responses.”

The authors compared plasma levels of active TGFβ1 were in 75 children with ASD to 68 controls, finding that they were significantly lower in the ASD group. Moreover…

“…there were significant correlations between psychological measures and TGFβ1 levels, such that lower TGFβ1 levels were associated with lower adaptive behaviors and worse behavioral symptoms. The data suggest that immune responses in autism may be inappropriately regulated due to reductions in TGFβ1.”

Their findings likely apply to a range of developmental, learning and behavioral disorders:

“Such immune dysregulation may predispose to the development of possible autoimmune responses and/or adverse neuroimmune interactions during critical windows in development.

Along these lines, a paper published in Biological Psychiatry describes the impaired immune tolerance due to deficiencies in regulatory T cells, another critical immune regulating factor in children with Tourette Syndrome. The authors state:

“Since regulatory T (T reg) cells play a major role in preventing autoimmunity, we hypothesized that a defect in T reg cells may be present in children with Tourette syndrome (TS).”

They analyzed the peripheral blood of TS kids compared to matched control subjects on multiple occasions to determine the numbers of CD4+CD25+CD69− T reg cells. The results were clear:

“A significant decrease in T reg cells was observed in patients with moderate to severe TS symptoms compared with healthy age-matched control children. A decrease in T reg cell number was also noted during symptom exacerbations in five out of six patients.”

Their conclusion affirms the role of autoimmunity in Tourette syndrome:

“These data support our hypothesis that at least some TS patients may have a decreased capacity to inhibit autoreactive lymphocytes through a deficit in T reg cells. Interactions of host T cell immunity and microbial factors may also contribute to the pathogenesis of TS.”

Early evidence for the role of autoimmunity in autism was presented in the journal Neuroscience Letters. The authors state:

“It is well established that increased neopterin levels are associated with activation of the cellular immune system and that reduced biopterins are essential for neurotransmitter synthesis. It has been suggested that some autistic children may be suffering from an autoimmune disorder.”

They measured these pterins in the urine of pre-school autistic children, their siblings and age-matched control children and found:

Both urinary neopterin and biopterin were raised in the autistic children compared to controls and the siblings showed intermediate values. This supports the possible involvement of cell-mediated immunity in the aetiology of autism.”

The finding for the non-autistic siblings shows again that brain autoimmunity can manifest on a wide spectrum.

Yet more evidence for autoimmune dysfunction in both kids with autism and their siblings was offered in a study published in the Journal of Neuroimmunology on antibrain antibodies:

“Serum autoantibodies to human brain, identified by ELISA and Western immunoblotting, were evaluated in 29 children with autism spectrum disorder (22 with autistic disorder), 9 non-autistic siblings and 13 controls.”

The authors sum up the abnormalities found by concluding:

“Results suggest that children with autistic disorder and their siblings exhibit differences compared to controls in autoimmune reactivity to specific epitopes located in distinct brain regions.”

No discussion of autoimmunity and the brain would be complete without considering the role of the gut, the site of 60-80% of all the immune system tissue in the body. A paper published in the Journal of Clinical Immunology describes the corresponding autoimmune intestinal inflammation in children with autism.

“A lymphocytic enterocolitis has been reported in a cohort of children with autistic spectrum disorder (ASD) and gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms. This study tested the hypothesis that dysregulated intestinal mucosal immunity with enhanced pro-inflammatory cytokine production is present in these ASD children.”

The authors performed duodenal biopsies and measured CD3+ lymphocytes in the colonic mucosa for the presence of the pro-inflammatory cytokines TNF-α, IL-2, IL-4, IFN-γ and the anti-inflammatory IL-10. Again we see a clear expression of autoimmunity:

“Duodenal and colonic mucosal CD3+ lymphocyte counts were elevated in ASD children compared with noninflamed controls. In the duodenum…epithelial TNF-α+ cells in ASD children [were] significantly greater compared with noninflamed controls but not coeliac disease controls…IL-10+ cells were fewer in ASD children than in noninflamed controls. In the colon,TNF-α+ and CD3+IFN-γ+ were more frequent in ASD children than in noninflamed controls.”

Note the similar findings for ASD and celiac disease. In striking accordance with with the authors found:

“There was a significantly greater proportion of TNF-α+ cells in colonic mucosa in those ASD children who had no dietary exclusion compared with those on a gluten and/or casein free diet. There is a consistent profile of lymphocyte cytokines in the small and large intestinal mucosa of these ASD children, involving increased pro-inflammatory and decreased regulatory activities.”

It would be a shame for any clinician or parent to be unaware of their conclusion:

“The data provide further evidence of a diffuse mucosal immunopathology in some ASD children and the potential for benefit of dietary and immunomodulatory therapies.

Regarding the link between autoimmune inflammation in the gut and brain it’s important to remember that the classical IgE-mediated food allergy diagnosed by skin prick is not usually the concern. Two papers published the Annals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology illustrate the point. In IgE and non-IgE food allergy the authors note that:

“Food allergy (FA) is characterized by an abnormal immunologic reactivity to food proteins. The gastro-intestinal tract serves not only a nutritive function but also is a major immunologic organ. Although previously thought to be triggered primarily by an IgE-mediated mechanism of injury, considerable evidence now suggests that non-IgE mechanisms may also be involved in the pathogenesis of FA.”

The authors gathered extensive data on a range of disorders including attention-deficit-hyperactivity disorder and behavioral disorders, and correlated them with immunologic deviations to Th1 or Th2 mechanisms of FA. Their conclusion is crucial knowledge for anyone treating food allergy mediated disorders:

“The results of this review allow the construction of a central, unifying hypothesis for a new classification of FA as follows: the clinical manifestations of FA, expressed in affected target organs, may be the result of immunologic injury mediated by interaction of food antigens with contiguous elements of mucosal associated lymphoid tissue. These appear to be modulated by relative imbalances of the Th1/Th2 paradigm, which may be the ultimate determinant governing the expression of FA as IgE-mediated, non-IgE-mediated, or mixed forms of IgE/non-IgE mechanisms of FA.”

This is critically important because Th1 and Th2 imbalances require different interventions; it also offers a partial explanation of why antibody tests for food allergy are not reliable. The recent post on why autoimmune and allergic diseases are on the rise is of interest in this context. We also see in the same issue of Annals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology a paper on the link between non-IgE-mediated food allergies and the inflamed lymphoid intestinal tissue that was described above in the report on mucosal immune activation and autism. Here the authors conclude:

“These studies suggest that abnormalities in Th1 function may not only play a role in some patients with non—IgE-mediated FA in whom decreased Th1 function is seen, but also in patients with celiac disease in whom an increased Th1 function is seen. The studies also suggest that lymphonodular hyperplasia may be a hallmark histologic lesion in patients with non—IgE-mediated FA.”

What does lymphonodular hyperplasia feel like? Sometimes nothing more than a little bloating. All of this helps us to appreciate the significance of neurologic disorders with gluten sensitivity. This was explored in a paper published in the journal Pediatrics more than six years ago:

“During the past 2 decades, celiac disease (CD) has been recognized as a multisystem autoimmune disorder. A growing body of distinct neurologic conditions such as cerebellar ataxia, epilepsy, myoclonic ataxia, chronic neuropathies, and dementia have been reported, mainly in middle-aged adults. There still are insufficient data on the association of CD with various neurologic disorders in children, adolescents, and young adults, including more common and “soft” neurologic conditions, such as headache, learning disorders, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and tic disorders. The aim of the present study is to look for a broader spectrum of neurologic disorders in CD patients, most of them children or young adults.”

The authors found that kids with CD were far more likely to develop neurologic disorders than the control subjects, including hypotonia, developmental delay, learning disorders and ADHD, headache, and cerebellar ataxia. Thus their conclusion:

“This study suggests that the variability of neurologic disorders that occur in CD is broader than previously reported and includes “softer” and more common neurologic disorders, such as chronic headache, developmental delay, hypotonia, and learning disorders or ADHD.”

Research published in the journal Nutritional Neuroscience clarifies one of the mechanisms behind autoimmune reaction to nervous system antigens in autism:

“We assessed the reactivity of sera from 50 autism patients and 50 healthy controls to specific peptides from gliadin and the cerebellum. A significant percentage of autism patients showed elevations in antibodies against gliadin and cerebellar peptides simultaneously.

The authors employed detailed antigen-antibody probes with confirmation by sophisticated DOT-immunoblot and inhibition studies to reach their conclusion:

“We conclude that a subgroup of patients with autism produce antibodies against Purkinje cells [a type of brain cell] and gliadin peptides, which may be responsible for some of the neurological symptoms in autism. “

Gliadin is the immunoreactive antigen contained in gluten.

Mention should also be made of the ability of infections to sometimes trigger an autoimmune disorder as discussed in a study published in the Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry on PANDAS (Pediatric Autoimmune Neuropsychiatric Disorders Associated with Streptococcus infections).

“…(PANDAS) is a recently recognized syndrome in which pre-adolescent children have abrupt onsets of tics and/or obsessive-compulsive symptoms, a recurring and remitting course of illness temporally related to streptococcal infections, and associated neurologic findings including adventitious movements, hyperactivity and emotional lability.

The authors undertook a search for clinical and laboratory evidence and found consistent clinical findings have been described in a large case series, including magnetic resonance imaging that shows inflammatory changes in the basal ganglia, along with anti-basal ganglia antibodies have been found in some acute cases that were similar to those against streptococcal antigens. They note in their conclusion:

“PANDAS…has stimulated new research endeavors into the possible links between bacterial pathogens, autoimmune reactions, and neuropsychiatric symptoms.”

Oral DMSA for elimination of toxic metals with autistic spectrum disorders

This research  on the safety and efficacy of oral DMSA (dimercapto succinic acid) therapy for children with autistic spectrum disorders was recently published in BMC Clinical Pharmacology in two parts:

  1. Part A—Medical results
  2. Part B—Behavioral results

The authors conclude in Part A: “Overall, DMSA therapy seems to be reasonably safe, effective in removing several toxic metals (especially lead), dramatically effective in normalizing RBC glutathione, and effective in normalizing platelet counts. Only 1 round (3 days) was sufficient to improve glutathione and platelets. Additional rounds increased excretion of toxic metals.”

They further state in their conclusion to Part B: “Overall, both one and seven rounds of DMSA therapy seems to be reasonably safe in children with ASD who have high urinary excretion of toxic metals, and possibly helpful in reducing some of the symptoms of autism in those children.” [RBC = red blood cell; ASD = autistic spectrum disorder]

Family history of autoimmune disease and autism linked

This interesting study evaluated data from 689,196 children from 1993 to 2004. The investigators observed: “Increased risk of ASDs was observed for children with a maternal history of rheumatoid arthritis and celiac disease. Also, increased risk of infantile autism was observed for children with a family history of type 1 diabetes.” [ASD = autistic spectrum disorders] This will not surprise Lapis Light patients who are aware of the vulnerability of the brain to autoimmune driven inflammation.